...
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine. >[313] U.S. AIR FORCE AVIATION SAFETY: FY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW
【24h】

[313] U.S. AIR FORCE AVIATION SAFETY: FY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW

机译:[313]美国空军航空安全:2016财年审查年度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Review of fiscal year (FY) 2016 statistics and analysis for USAF Class A, Aviation mishaps including classification with DoD Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (DoD HFACS). METHODS: FY16 data was obtained from the USAF Safety Center database for Aviation mishaps and reviewed for human factors as determined by the Safety Investigation Boards (SIB). The human factors present were categorized for the present year and the preceding 8 years. RESULTS: The U.S. Air Force experienced 12 Class A aviation mishaps during FY16 (a rate of 0.88 per 100,000 flight hours) with 9 destroyed aircraft and 16 fatalities. The review of Class A aviation mishaps over the past year demonstrated that most are attributed to human factors. The use and analysis of DoD HFACS will be discussed. DISCUSSION: Although the total number of Class A aviation mishaps and the overall Class A mishap rate decreased significantly from FY15, the number of fatalities increased due to the types of aircraft involved. Human factors analysis reveals patterns of contributory factors that appear to be amenable to organizational influence.
机译:简介:2016年度财政年度(FY)2016年USAF级A的统计分析,航空审计,包括与国防部人为因素分析和分类系统的分类(DOD HFAC)。方法:从USAF安全中心数据库获得FY16数据,用于航空审查,并审查了由安全调查委员会(SIB)确定的人为因素。目前的人为因素被分类为目前和前期的8年。结果:美国空军在2016财年(每10万次飞行时间0.88的速度)经历了12级航空事故,拥有9个被摧毁的飞机和16个死亡率。过去一年中的A级航空意外审查表明,大多数人归因于人为因素。将讨论DOD HFAC的使用和分析。讨论:虽然来自2015财年的航空航行班姐妹的总数和总体阶级的日志率明显下降,但由于所涉及的飞机类型,死亡率的数量增加。人为因素分析揭示了似乎适应组织影响的贡献因素的模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号