...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Plastic Surgery >A Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Utilization Between Plastic Surgeons and General Surgeons in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
【24h】

A Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Utilization Between Plastic Surgeons and General Surgeons in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

机译:基于植入物乳房重建的整形外科医生与普通外科医生的结果与资源利用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Because of lack of patient education on the importance of surgeon certification and barriers to access a plastic surgeon (PS), non-PSs are becoming more involved in providing implant-based breast reconstruction procedures. We aim to clarify differences in outcomes and resource utilization by surgical specialty for implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014. Patients undergoing immediate implant-based reconstruction or immediate/delayed tissue expander-based reconstruction were identified (Current Procedural Terminology codes 19340 and 19357, respectively). Outcomes studied were major and wound-based 30-day complications, operation time, unplanned readmission or reoperation, and length of hospital stay. Results We identified 9264 patients who underwent prosthesis or tissue expander-based breast reconstruction, 8362 (90.3%) by PSs and 902 (9.7%) by general surgeons (GSs). There were significant differences in major complications between specialty (1.2% PS vs 2.8% GS; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in unplanned reoperation (5.3% PS vs 4.9% GS; P = 0.592), unplanned readmissions (4.3% PS vs 3.8% GS; P = 0.555), wound dehiscence (0.7% PS vs 0.6% GS; P = 0.602), or wound-based infection rates (2.9% PS vs 2.8% GS; P = 0.866). As it pertains to resource utilization, the GS patients had a significantly longer length of stay (1.02 +/- 4.41 days PS vs 1.62 +/- 4.07 days GS; P < 0.001) and operative time (164.3 +/- 97.6 minutes PS vs 185.4 +/- 126.5 minutes; P = 0.001) than PS patients. Conclusions This current assessment demonstrates that patients who undergo breast implant reconstruction by a GS have significantly more major complications. It is beneficial for the health care system for PSs to be the primary providers of breast reconstruction services. Measures should be taken to ensure that PSs are available and encouraged to provide this service.
机译:背景由于缺乏外科医生认证和访问整形外科医生(PS)的重要性的患者教育,非PSS越来越多地参与提供基于植入物的乳房重建程序。我们的目的是阐明外科乳房重建外科专业的结果和资源利用的差异。方法从2012年至2014年从美国外科医生国家外科院校的美国外科医学院获得数据。确定正在进行立即植入物的重建或立即/延迟组织扩展器的重建(当前程序术语法定19340年和19357年) 。研究的结果是主要和基于伤口的30天并发症,操作时间,无计划的入院或重新组合,以及住院时间。结果我们鉴定了9264名患者经过假体或组织扩展器的乳腺重建,PSS和902(9.7%)通过通用外科医生(GSS)进行了8362(90.3%)。特种之间的主要并发症有显着差异(1.2%PS与2.8%GS; P <0.001)。无计划的重新组合没有显着差异(5.3%PS与4.9%GS; P = 0.592),无计划的入伍(4.3%PS与3.8%GS; P = 0.555),伤口裂开(0.7%PS与0.6%GS; P. = 0.602),或基于伤口的感染率(2.9%PS与2.8%GS; P = 0.866)。由于它涉及资源利用率,GS患者的逗留时间明显更长(1.02 +/- 4.41天PS与1.62 +/- 4.07天GS; P <0.001)和操作时间(164.3 +/- 97.6分钟PS VS 185.4 +/- 126.5分钟; p = 0.001)比ps患者。结论本前评估表明,由GS进行乳腺植入物重建的患者具有显着更大的并发症。对PSS的医疗保健系统是乳房重建服务的主要提供者是有益的。应采取措施确保PSS可获得并鼓励提供此服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号