...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in white and black patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in a safety-net hospital
【24h】

Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in white and black patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in a safety-net hospital

机译:安全网医院筛查结肠镜检查的白和黑患者晚期结直肠瘤形成的患病率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Black persons are more likely than white persons to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and to die from it. The extent to which genetic or biological factors versus disparities in screening rates explain this variance remains controversial. Objective: To define the prevalence and location of presymptomatic advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) among white and black persons undergoing screening colonoscopy, controlling for other epidemiologic risk factors. Design: Cross-sectional survey between 22 March 2005 and 31 January 2012. Setting: Urban, open-access, academic, safety-net hospital in Massachusetts. Participants: Asymptomatic, average-risk white (n = 1172) and black (n = 1681) persons aged 50 to 79 years undergoing screening colonoscopy. Measurements: Adjusted prevalence and location of ACN, defined as a tubular adenoma 10 mm or more in size, any adenoma with villous features or high-grade dysplasia, any dysplastic serrated lesion, or invasive cancer. Results: The prevalence of ACN was higher among white patients than black patients (6.8% vs. 5.0%; P = 0.039) but varied by sex (white vs. black men, 9.3% vs. 5.7%; white vs. black women, 3.5% vs. 4.3%; interaction P = 0.034). After controlling for many risk factors, black men were 41% less likely than white men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89]) to have ACN. No statistically significant difference was seen for women (AOR, 1.32 [CI, 0.73 to 2.40]). Black patients with ACN had a higher percentage of proximal disease (52% vs. 39%) after adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.055). Limitation: Single-institution study with inadequate statistical power for subgroup analyses and recall bias. Conclusion: Black men are less likely than white men to have ACN at screening colonoscopy in a safety-net health care setting. Disparities in access to screening and differential exposure to modifiable risk factors rather than genetic or biological factors may be largely responsible for the higher incidence of CRC among black men. Genetic or biological factors may explain the predilection for proximal disease.
机译:背景:黑人比白人更有可能被诊断出患有结直肠癌并死于它。遗传或生物因素对筛选率差异的程度解释了这种方差仍然存在争议。目的:确定筛选结肠镜检查的白和黑人患者患病率和位置,控制其他流行病学危险因素。设计:2005年3月22日至2012年1月31日的横断面调查。环境:马萨诸塞州的城市,开放式,学术,安全网医院。参与者:在进行筛选结肠镜检查的50至79岁以下的症状,平均风险白(n = 1172)和黑色(n = 1681)人。测量:调整患病率和ACN的位置,定义为10mm或更大的管状腺瘤,任何腺瘤,患有绒毛特征或高级发育性,任何发育性锯齿病病变或侵入性癌症。结果:白患者的ACN患病率高于黑色患者(6.8%vs. 5.0%; P = 0.039),但是性别(白色与黑人男性,9.3%vs.5.7%;白色与黑人女性, 3.5%与4.3%;相互作用P = 0.034)。在控制许多风险因素后,黑人男性比白人更少41%(调整的赔率比[AOR],0.59 [95%CI,0.39至0.89])才能进行ACN。对女性(AOR,1.32 [CI,0.73至2.40])没有看到统计学上的差异。在调整年龄和性别后,患有ACN的黑人患者的近端疾病(52%vs.39%)(P = 0.055)。限制:单一机构研究,亚组分析和召回偏见的统计力量不足。结论:黑人男性不太可能在安全网保健环境中筛选结肠镜检查的ACN。获得筛选和差异暴露于可改变的风险因素而不是遗传或生物因素的差异可能主要对黑人男性CRC的发病率较高。遗传或生物因素可以解释近端疾病的偏移。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Annals of Internal Medicine》 |2013年第1期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Section of Gastroenterology Department of Medicine Boston University School of Medicine 85 East;

    Section of Infectious Disease Department of Medicine Boston University School of Medicine 85;

    Data Coordinating Center Boston University School of Public Health 801 Massachusetts Avenue;

    Department of Anatomic Pathology Boston University School of Medicine 88 East Newton Street;

    Department of Biostatistics University School of Public Health 801 Massachusetts Avenue Boston;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号