...
首页> 外文期刊>Adapted physical activity quarterly >“What’s the Difference?”Women’s Wheelchair Basketball,Reverse Integration, and the Question(ing) of Disability
【24h】

“What’s the Difference?”Women’s Wheelchair Basketball,Reverse Integration, and the Question(ing) of Disability

机译:“有什么区别?”妇女的轮椅篮球,反向整合和残疾问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The inclusion of able-bodied athletes within disability sport, a phenomenon known as reverse integration, has sparked significant debate within adapted physical activity. Although researchers and practitioners have taken up positions for or against reverse integration, there is a lack of supporting research on the experiences of athletes who already play in such settings. In this study, we explore how competitive female athletes who have a disability experience reverse integration in Canadian wheelchair basketball. Athletic identity was used as the initial conceptual framework to guide semistructured interviews with nine participants. The results suggest that participation in this context contributed to positive athletic identities. Interviews also pointed to the unexpected theme of “what’s the difference?”that this sporting context provided a space for the questioning and creative negotiation of the categories of disability and able-bodiedness. Methodologically,this paper also explores the possibilities and challenges of inter- worldview and insider-outsider research collaboration.
机译:身体健康的运动员被纳入残疾运动中,这种现象被称为反向融合,在适应的体育活动中引发了广泛的争论。尽管研究人员和从业人员已采取立场支持或反对反向整合,但仍缺乏对已经在这种环境中比赛的运动员的经验进行支持性研究的依据。在这项研究中,我们探索了具有残疾的竞技女运动员如何在加拿大轮椅篮球中逆向融合。运动身份被用作指导与9名参与者进行半结构式访谈的初始概念框架。结果表明,在这种情况下参与有助于积极的体育身份。访谈还指出了意想不到的主题“有什么区别?”,这种体育背景为残障和健壮类别的提问和创造性谈判提供了空间。从方法上讲,本文还探讨了国际视野和内部—外部研究合作的可能性和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号