...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Ice particle sampling from aircraft - influence of the probing position on the ice water content
【24h】

Ice particle sampling from aircraft - influence of the probing position on the ice water content

机译:飞机冰颗粒取样 - 探测位置对冰水含量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The ice water content (IWC) of cirrus clouds is an essential parameter determining their radiative properties and thus is important for climate simulations. Therefore, for a reliable measurement of IWC on board research aircraft, it is important to carefully design the ice crystal sampling and measuring devices. During the ML-CIRRUS field campaign in 2014 with the German Gulfstream GV HALO (High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft), IWC was recorded by three closed-path total water together with one gas-phase water instrument. The hygrometers were supplied by inlets mounted on the roof of the aircraft fuselage. Simultaneously, the IWC is determined by a cloud particle spectrometer attached under an aircraft wing. Two more examples of simultaneous IWC measurements by hygrometers and cloud spectrometers are presented, but the inlets of the hygrometers were mounted at the fuselage side (M-55 Geophysica, Stra-toClim campaign 2017) and bottom (NASA WB57, MacPex campaign 2011). This combination of instruments and inlet positions provides the opportunity to experimentally study the influence of the ice particle sampling position on the IWC with the approach of comparative measurements. As expected from theory and shown by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations, we found that the IWCs provided by the roof inlets deviate from those measured under the aircraft wing. As a result of the inlet position in the shadow zone behind the aircraft cockpit, ice particle populations with mean mass sizes larger than about 25 mu m radius are subject to losses, which lead to strongly underestimated IWCs. On the other hand, cloud populations with mean mass sizes smaller than about 12 mu m are dominated by particle enrichment and thus overestimated IWCs. In the range of mean mass sizes between 12 and 25 mu m, both enrichment and losses of ice crystals can occur, depending on whether the ice crystal mass peak of the size distribution - in these cases bimodal - is on the smaller or larger mass mode. The resulting deviations of the IWC reach factors of up to 10 or even more for losses as well as for enrichment. Since the mean mass size of ice crystals increases with temperature, losses are more pronounced at higher temperatures, while at lower temperatures IWC is more affected by enrichment. In contrast, in the cases where the hygrometer inlets were mounted at the fuselage side or bottom, the agreement of IWCs is most frequently within a factor of 2.5 or better - due to less disturbed ice particle sampling, as expected from theory - independently of the mean ice crystal sizes. The rather large scatter between IWC measurements reflects, for example, cirrus cloud inhomogeneities and instrument uncertainties as well as slight sampling biases which might also occur on the side or bottom of the fuselage and under the wing. However, this scatter is in the range of other studies and represent the current best possible IWC recording on fast-flying aircraft.
机译:Cirrus云的冰水含量(IWC)是确定其辐射特性的基本参数,因此对于气候模拟非常重要。因此,在研究飞机上的IWC可靠测量,重要的是要仔细设计冰晶采样和测量装置。在2014年的ML-Cirrus Field运动期间,德国湾流GV光环(高海拔和远程研究飞机),IWC与三个闭路总水与一个气相水仪器一起记录。湿度计通过安装在飞机机身屋顶上的入口供应。同时,IWC由安装在飞机机翼下的云粒子光谱仪确定。提出了通过湿度计和云光谱仪的同时IWC测量的另外两个示例,但湿度计的入口安装在机身侧(M-55 Geophysica,2017年)和底部(NASA WB57,MacPex Campaign 2011)。这种仪器和入口位置的组合提供了通过比较测量的方法来实验研究冰颗粒采样位置对IWC的影响的机会。从理论和计算流体动力学(CFD)计算所预期的那样,我们发现由屋顶入口提供的IWC偏离飞机机翼下测量的IWC。由于飞机驾驶舱背后的荫区域中的入口位置,具有大于约25μm半径的平均质量尺寸的冰粒子群受到损失的影响,这导致强烈低估的IWC。另一方面,具有小于约12μm的平均质量尺寸的云种群由颗粒富集和因此高估的IWC来支配。在12至25μm的平均质量尺寸的范围内,可以发生富集和冰晶的损失,这取决于尺寸分布的冰晶质量峰值是否在这些情况下是较小或更大的质量模式。由于损失以及富集,IWC达到10甚至更​​多的因素所产生的偏差。由于冰晶的平均质量尺寸随温度的增加而增加,因此在较高温度下更明显的损失,而在较低的温度下,IWC更受富集的影响。相反,在湿度计入口安装在机身侧或底部的情况下,IWCS的协议最常见于2.5或更好 - 由于冰颗粒采样较少,从理论上预期 - 独立于平均冰晶尺寸。 IWC测量之间的相当大的散射反射,例如,卷云云不均匀性和仪器不确定性以及略微采样偏差,这也可能发生在机身的侧面或底部和机翼下方。然而,这种分散在其他研究的范围内,并且代表了快速飞行器上最佳可能的IWC录制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric Measurement Techniques》 |2018年第7期|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

    Phys Tech Bundesanstalt Braunschweig Braunschweig Germany;

    Phys Tech Bundesanstalt Braunschweig Braunschweig Germany;

    Deutsch Zentrum Luft &

    Raumfahrt Inst Phys Atmosphere Oberpfaffenhofen Germany;

    Deutsch Zentrum Luft &

    Raumfahrt Inst Phys Atmosphere Oberpfaffenhofen Germany;

    Deutsch Zentrum Luft &

    Raumfahrt Inst Phys Atmosphere Oberpfaffenhofen Germany;

    Deutsch Zentrum Luft &

    Raumfahrt Inst Phys Atmosphere Oberpfaffenhofen Germany;

    Deutsch Zentrum Luft &

    Raumfahrt Inst Phys Atmosphere Oberpfaffenhofen Germany;

    Harvard Univ Anderson Grp CCB Cambridge MA 02138 USA;

    SPEC Inc Boulder CO USA;

    CAO Dept Upper Atmospher Layers Phys Moscow Russia;

    UPMC Univ Paris 06 UVSQ Univ Paris Saclay CNRS LATMOS IPSL Guyancourt France;

    Forschungszentrum Julich Inst Energy &

    Climate Res IEK 7 Julich Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号