首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Topographic Matching of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Using Lateral Femoral Condyle for the Treatment of Medial Femoral Condyle Lesions: A?Computer-Simulated Model Study
【24h】

Topographic Matching of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Using Lateral Femoral Condyle for the Treatment of Medial Femoral Condyle Lesions: A?Computer-Simulated Model Study

机译:骨质色神经移植移植对外侧股骨髁的地形匹配,用于治疗内侧股骨髁病:a?计算机模拟模型研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether lateral femoral condyle (LFC) osteochondral allografts (OCAs) would have a similar articular cartilage contour and resulting subchondral bone contour when compared with medial femoral condyle (MFC) allografts for the treatment of MFC chondral defects. MethodsIn this controlled laboratory study, human femoral hemi-condyles (10?MFCs and 8 LFCs) were divided into 4 groups: MFC recipient, MFC donor, ipsilateral LFC donor, and contralateral LFC donor. Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained for each, and 3D CT models were created and exported into point-cloud models. Three circular defect and graft models were created on each condyle at 3 locations (0°, 45° posterior, and 90° posterior regions). The graft model in each donor group was virtually placed on the MFC recipient defect model. The least distances of the articular cartilage surface between the graft and the defect models and the resulting mean least distance of the subchondral bone surface were calculated. ResultsThe mean least distance of the articular cartilage surface was less than 0.5?mm in all donor–recipients, and there was no significant difference among donor groups. Although the mean least distance of the subchondral bone surface was significantly greater than the articular cartilage surface in all donor groups (P< .001), there was no significant difference among donor groups. ConclusionIpsilateral and contralateral LFC grafts provided similar articular cartilage surface and resulting subchondral bone surface matching with that of MFC grafts, suggesting that LFCs could be a potential source of OCA for the treatment of MFC lesions. Clinical RelevanceIpsilateral and contralateral LFCs can be suitable donor sites for the treatment of MFC lesions with OCAs.
机译:本研究的目的目的是确定侧向股骨髁(LFC)骨质色神经移植物(OCAS)是否具有类似的关节软骨轮廓和导致骨髓内骨轮廓,与内侧股骨髁(MFC)同种异体移植物相比,用于治疗MFC骨缺陷。方法对受控实验室研究,人类股骨半髁(10〜MFCs和8 LFC)分为4组:MFC受体,MFC供体,Ipsilidal LFC供体和对侧LFC供体。计算的断层扫描(CT)图像是针对每个的图像,并创建3D CT模型并导出到点云模型中。在3个位置(0°,45°后部和90°后部区域)的每个髁上在每个髁上创建三个圆形缺陷和移植模型。每个供体组的移植模型几乎放在MFC受体缺陷模型上。据计算了移植物和缺陷模型之间的关节软骨表面的最小距离以及所得的子骨表骨表面的至少距离。在所有供体接受者中,关节软骨表面的至少距离小于0.5Ωmm,施主组无显着差异。虽然子骨髓骨表面的至少距离显着大于所有供体基团的关节软骨表面(P <.001),但供体组中没有显着差异。结论海侧和对侧LFC移植物提供了类似的关节软骨表面,并导致与MFC移植物的骨髓骨表面匹配,表明LFC可以是用于治疗MFC病变的OCA的潜在来源。临床相关性和对侧LFC可以是适用于用OCAS治疗MFC病变的适合供体部位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号