首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years
【24h】

Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years

机译:隧道放大和临床结果的生物可吸收干涉螺钉与皮质锁定柱固定在关节镜双束前十字条纹韧带重构中的临床结果:一项潜在的随机研究,最短的2年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the tunnel enlargement rate and clinical function by comparing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using different fixation devices. Methods: Patients receiving primary arthroscopic double-bundle ACLR were screened and divided into 2 groups on the basis of the method of graft fixation: bioabsorbable interference screw (BS) group and cortical button (CB) group. Bone tunnel size was assessed digitally using magnetic resonance imaging, which was performed a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Clinical evaluations were performed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and KT-1000 arthrometer 2 years postoperatively. Results: Sixty patients receiving primary arthroscopic double-bundle ACLR were included. Overall, the BS group showed greater tunnel enlargement than the CB group, as well as a significantly increased rate of tunnel communication (P = .029). The average anteromedial tunnel enlargement rates for the BS and CB groups were 50% and 28%, respectively. The enlargement rate of the posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel was similar in both groups. In the PL tibial tunnel, the CB group showed a significant increase in enlargement compared with the BS group (64% vs 45%, P = .0001). Both groups showed functional improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee score. No significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes was found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The BS group showed significantly greater tunnel enlargement in anteromedial tunnels and an increased tunnel communication rate compared with the CB group. On the other hand, the CB group showed greater tunnel enlargement in tibial PL tunnels. Tunnel communication was observed mostly on the tibial side in the BS patients. Equivalent clinical function outcomes were noted at 2 years after surgery in both groups of patients.
机译:目的:通过使用不同的固定装置比较双束前十字韧带重建(ACLR)来研究隧道放大率和临床功能。方法:根据接枝固定方法筛选接受原发性关节镜双束ACLR的患者,并分为2组:生物可吸收干涉螺杆(BS)组和皮质按钮(CB)组。使用磁共振成像进行数字评估骨隧道尺寸,术后至少2年进行。术后2年使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果,国际膝关节委员会评分和KT-1000节肢仪进行临床评估。结果:六十名接受原发性关节镜双束ACLR的患者。总体而言,BS组比CB组显示出更大的隧道放大,以及显着增加的隧道通信率(P = .029)。 BS和Cb基团的平均前隧道扩大率分别为50%和28%。两组的后外侧(PL)股隧道的增大率相似。在PL胫骨隧道中,与BS组相比,CB组的增大显着增加(64%Vs 45%,P = .0001)。两组患者对膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果分数和国际膝关节文件委员会得分的官能改善。在2组之间发现了术后功能结果的显着差异。结论:与CB组相比,BS组在前隧道中显示出更大的隧道扩大和增加的隧道通信速率。另一方面,CB组在胫骨PL隧道中显示出更大的隧道扩大。隧道通信主要在BS患者的胫骨面上观察到。在两组患者手术后2年注意到同等临床功能结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号