首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Button Fixation Versus Transfemoral Suspensory Fixation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Button Fixation Versus Transfemoral Suspensory Fixation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:使用皮质按钮固定的前十字韧带重建临床和功能性结果与转发悬浮症固定 - 随机对照试验的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using cortical button versus transfemoral suspensory fixation. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook guidelines and PROSPERO registration. Only Level I and II randomized controlled trials comparing cortical button and transfemoral suspensory fixation in hamstring ACL reconstruction were included. A literature search was performed using electronic databases. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. All outcomes reported by each study were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Dichotomous data were reported as risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-2. Results: Five studies involving 317 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 21.7 +/- 7.0 months (range, 12 to 38 months). The mean age of participants was 26.7 +/- 1.89 years (range, 16 to 48 years). The Lysholmscore, Tegner activity score, and IKDC score were compiled. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side differences on KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing, and measurements of thigh atrophy, as well as imaging (radiography and computed tomography) to assess for femoral tunnel widening. Pooled statistical analysis was possible only for postoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores. No significant differences were found between the cortical button and transfemoral fixation groups. Included studies did not report differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Radiographic results suggest increased femoral tunnel widening in the cortical button group. However, tunnel widening was not found to affect clinical results. Conclusions: The present evidence suggests that there are no short-to medium-term differences in knee-specific outcome measures between patients treated with cortical button femoral graft fixation and those treated with suspensory transfemoral fixation when undergoing ACL reconstruction. In addition, radiologic evidence of tunnel widening does not seem to affect short-to medium-term clinical outcomes.
机译:目的:使用皮质按钮与转发悬浮悬浮固定进行前列韧带(ACL)重建后比较临床和功能结果。方法:在Cochrane手册指南和Prospero注册后进行了该系统审查。包括群体I和II级别随机对照试验比较腿筋ACL重建中的皮质按钮和转熔悬浮固定。使用电子数据库执行文献搜索。使用Cochrane协作的偏置工具评估包括研究的方法质量。评估每项研究报告的所有结果。主要结果措施是术后国际膝关节文件(IKDC)和Lysholm膝盖分数。使用Revman软件(北欧Cochrane Centre,Cochrane Collaboration,Copenhagen)进行统计分析。二分法数据被报告为风险比率和95%的置信区间。使用I-2评估异质性。结果:包括317名患者的五项研究。平均随访时间为21.7 +/- 7.0个月(范围,12至38个月)。参与者的平均年龄是26.7 +/- 1.89年(范围,16至48岁)。 Lysholmoore,Tegner活动分数和IKDC得分是编制的。 Lachman测试进行临床评估,评估KT-1000(Medetric,SAN Diego,CA)测试和大腿萎缩的测量,以及对股骨的成像(放射线照相和计算断层扫描)进行评估。隧道加宽。汇总统计分析仅适用于术后IKDC和Lysholm评分。皮质按钮和转熔固定组之间没有发现显着差异。包括的研究没有报告2组之间的临床结果的差异。射线照相结果表明皮质按钮组中的股骨隧道增加。然而,未发现隧道扩展会影响临床结果。结论:本证据表明,在进行ACL重建时,用皮质按钮股骨移植固定治疗的患者之间的膝关节结果措施没有短至中期差异。此外,隧道扩展的放射学证据似乎似乎不会影响短至中期临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号