...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Economic evaluation of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage based on results from the MIST trial.
【24h】

Economic evaluation of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage based on results from the MIST trial.

机译:根据MIST试验的结果,对孕早期流产的其他管理方法的经济评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage. DESIGN: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a large randomised controlled trial (the MIST trial). SETTING: Early pregnancy assessment units of seven participating hospitals in southern England. SAMPLE: A total of 1200 women with a confirmed pregnancy of less than 13 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of incomplete miscarriage or missed miscarriage. METHODS: Random allocation to expectant management, medical management or surgical management. Collection of health service and broader resource use data, unit costs for each resource item and clinical outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs (pounds, 2001-02 prices) to the health service, social services, women, carers and wider society during the first 8 weeks postrandomisation. Cost-effectiveness estimates, expressed in terms of incremental cost per gynaecological infection prevented; cost-effectiveness acceptability curves presented at alternative willingness-to-pay thresholds for preventing gynaecological infection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of gynaecological infection between groups. The net societal cost per woman was estimated at 1086.20 pounds in the expectant group, 1410.40 pounds in the medical group and 1585.30 pounds in the surgical group. Expectant management had a 97.8% probability of being the most cost-effective management method at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 10,000 pounds for preventing one gynaecological infection, while medical management had a 2.2% probability of being the most cost-effective management method. Expectant management retained the highest probability of being the most cost-effective management method at all willingness-to-pay thresholds of less than 70,000 pounds for preventing one gynaecological infection. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant and medical management of first-trimester miscarriage possess significant economic advantages over traditional surgical management.
机译:目的:比较孕早期流产的替代管理方法的成本效益。设计:与大型随机对照试验(MIST试验)一起进行经济评估。地点:英格兰南部七家参与医院的早期妊娠评估部门。样本:共有1200名经证实的妊娠少于妊娠13周的女性,被诊断为流产不全或流产遗漏。方法:随机分配至预期管理,医疗管理或手术管理。收集卫生服务和更广泛的资源使用数据,每个资源项目的单位成本以及临床结果。主要观察指标:随机化后的前8周内,卫生服务,社会服务,妇女,护理人员和更广泛的社会的成本(英镑,2001-02年价格)。成本效益评估,以预防的每次妇科感染的增量成本表示;预防妇科感染的替代支付意愿阈值上显示的成本效益可接受性曲线。结果:两组之间的妇科感染发生率无显着差异。预期组中每名妇女的净社会成本为1086.20磅,医疗组为1410.40磅,外科组为1585.30磅。预期管理有97.8%的可能性是最经济有效的管理方法,愿意支付10,000英镑的门槛可预防一种妇科感染,而医学管理有2.2%的可能性是最具成本效益的管理方法。在所有愿意支付的阈值均低于70,000磅的情况下,预期管理保留了最高的成本效益管理方法,可以预防一种妇科感染。结论:与传统的外科手术管理相比,孕早期流产的预期和医疗管理具有明显的经济优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号