首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Non-operative treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with two different braces—ankle-foot orthosis versus knee unloader brace
【24h】

Non-operative treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with two different braces—ankle-foot orthosis versus knee unloader brace

机译:非手术治疗膝关节的Unicompartmal骨关节炎:具有两个不同牙套的前瞻性随机试验 - 踝足矫形器与膝盖卸载器支撑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The use of an unloader brace is a non-surgical treatment option for patients with medial osteoarthritis (OA). However, many patients do not adhere to brace treatment, because of skin irritation due to the pads at the level of the joint space and bad fit. A new concept to unload the medial compartment of the knee is a foot ankle brace with a lever arm pressing the thigh in valgus. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to examine the outcomes of patients with medial OA after treatment with a conventional knee unloader brace (Unloader One) and the new foot ankle orthosis (Agilium FreeStep). Methods For this multicenter trial, 160 patients (>35 years) with medial OA were randomly allocated to treatment with a conventional knee unloader brace (Unloader One) or treatment with the new knee OA ankle brace (Agilium FreeStep). The primary outcome measure was pain (numerical analog scale) at baseline (TO), 8 weeks (Tl), and 6 months (T2). Secondary outcome measures were knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, KOOS), side effects, additional interventions, and compliance. Results In both groups, walking pain improved between TO and Tl and also between TO and T2 without a significant group difference. For pain at sports, both groups showed a significant improvement between TO and T2 without a significant group difference. The KOOS subscales symptoms, pain, activity, sport, and quality of life increased significantly in both treatment groups without any significant group differences at T 0, Tl, and T2. There was also no significant group difference in additional interventions and weekly or daily brace use. In the Agilium FreeStep group (23.5%), significantly less patients reported bruises in contrast to the Unloader One group (66.7%). Discussion The results of this clinical trial show that the foot ankle brace is as effective as a conventional knee unloader brace for the treatment of medial knee OA with regard to clinical outcome. The rate of side effects such as bruises was significantly lower in the Agilium FreeStep group.
机译:背景技术卸载器支架的使用是内侧骨关节炎(OA)患者的非手术治疗选择。然而,许多患者不粘附在支架治疗中,因为皮肤刺激由于关节空间的水平和良好的垫子。一个新的概念来卸下膝盖的内侧舱是一支脚踝支撑,带有杠杆臂的杠杆臂压迫大腿。该前瞻性随机试验的目的是在用传统的膝盖卸载机构(卸载机构)和新的脚踝矫形器(Agilium Serepep)处理后检查患有内侧OA患者的结果。对于这种多中心试验的方法,随机分配160名患者(> 35岁),随机分配与传统的膝盖卸载器支架(卸载)或用新的膝盖OA踝支撑(藿香酱)进行治疗。基线(至),8周(TL)和6个月(T2)时,主要结果测量是疼痛(数值模拟量表)。次要结果措施是膝关节(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎成果得分,KOOS),副作用,额外干预和遵守。结果两组,步行疼痛改善到T1和T1之间,而且在没有显着的群体差异的情况下。对于运动的疼痛,两组在没有显着的群体差异的情况下表现出与T2之间的显着改善。在治疗组的治疗组中,KOOS分类症状,疼痛,活动,运动和生活质量显着增加,而没有任何显着的群体差异在T 0,T1和T2。额外的干预措施和每周或每日支架使用也没有显着的群体差异。在藿香糖尿病组(23.5%)中,与卸载机组(66.7%)对比,患者显着减少了瘀伤。讨论该临床试验的结果表明,脚踝支撑与传统的膝盖卸载器支架一样有效,用于治疗临床结果的内侧膝关节OA。藿香菌属群落中诸如瘀伤等副作用率显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号