...
首页> 外文期刊>Artery research >Modeling radial artery pressure waveforms using curve fitting: Comparison of four types of fitting functions
【24h】

Modeling radial artery pressure waveforms using curve fitting: Comparison of four types of fitting functions

机译:使用曲线拟合建模径向动脉压力波形:四种拟合功能的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Curve fitting has been intensively used to model artery pressure waveform (APW). The modelling accuracy can greatly influence the calculation of APWs parameters that serve as quantitative measures for assessing the morphological characteristics of APWs. However, it is unclear which fitting function is more suitable for APW. In this paper, we compared the fitting accuracies of four types of fitting functions, including Raleigh function, double-exponential function, Gaussian function, and logarithmic normal function, in modeling radial artery pressure waveform (RAPW). Methods: RAPWs were recorded from 24 healthy subjects in resting supine position. To perform curve fitting, 10 consecutive stable RAPWs for each subject were randomly selected and each waveform was fitted using three instances of the same fitting function. Results: The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of the fitting results were 5.89% ± 0.46% (standard deviation), 3.31% ± 0.22%, 2.25% ± 0.31%, and 1.49% ± 0.28% for Raleigh function, double-exponential function, Gaussian function, and logarithmic normal function, respectively. Their corresponding mean maximum residual errors were 23.71%, 17.83%, 6.11%, and 5.49%. Conclusions: The performance of using Gaussian function and logarithmic normal function to model RAPW is comparable, and is better than that of using Raleigh function and double-exponential function.
机译:背景:曲线配件被强烈地用于模拟动脉压波形(APW)。建模精度可以大大影响APWS参数的计算,其作为评估APW的形态特征的定量措施。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种拟合功能更适合APW。在本文中,我们将四种类型的拟合功能的拟合精度进行了比较,包括罗利函数,双指数函数,高斯函数和对数正常功能,在建模径向动脉压力波形(RapW)中。方法:Rapws从24个健康受试者记录在休息的仰卧位。为了执行曲线拟合,随机选择用于每个受试者的10个连续的稳定RAPW,并且使用相同拟合功能的三个实例配合每个波形。结果:拟合结果的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为5.89%±0.46%(标准差),罗利函数的3.31%±0.22%,2.25%±0.31%和1.49%±0.28%,双指数功能,高斯函数和对数正常功能。它们相应的平均最大残留误差为23.71%,17.83%,6.11%和5.49%。结论:使用高斯函数和对数正常功能模拟Rapw的性能是可比的,并且优于使用罗利函数和双指数函数的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号