首页> 外文期刊>Acta tropica: Journal of Biomedical Sciences >Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis.
【24h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis.

机译:两种局部巴龙霉素治疗与葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗新世界皮肤利什曼病的效果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The randomized, controlled study compared the therapeutic efficacy and safety of two paromomycin-containing topical preparations with the gold treatment standard, meglumine antimoniate, and with each other in 120 Ecuadorian patients with ulcerated lesions. The two paromomycin treatment comparisons were double-blinded. Group 1 ( [Formula: see text] ) received 15% paromomycin plus 12% methylbenzonium chloride (PR-MBCL) dissolved in a soft white paraffin base, applied twice daily for 30 days. Group 2 ( [Formula: see text] ) was also treated for 30 days with 15% paromomycin plus 10% urea (PR-U) dissolved in the same paraffin base. Group 3 ( [Formula: see text] ) received 20mg/kg/day of IM meglumine antimoniate (MA) for 10 days as per Ecuadorian Ministry of Public Health recommendations at the time of the study. The 10-day treatment was completed by 90% of the MA group compared to 72.5% of the PR-MBCL ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] ) and 75% of the PM-U ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) groups whose treatment regime lasted 20 days longer than the MA treatment. Post-treatment lesion burning, redness, inflammation, and soreness were more common in the two paromomycin groups compared to MA group ( [Formula: see text] ). The frequency of treatment-related side effects in the two paromomycin groups was similar. Six weeks after the start of treatment, 80.6% of MA subjects were clinically cured compared to 48.3% in the PR-MBCL ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] ) and 40% in the PM-U groups ( [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] ). By 12 weeks, the proportion of clinically cured subjects in the MA (91.7%) compared to PM-MBCL (79.3%) or PM-U (70%) groups was not significantly different ( [Formula: see text] ). MA-treated subjects clinically cured by 12 weeks had a faster mean healing time ( [Formula: see text] days) compared to those in the PM-MBCL (versus [Formula: see text] days, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] ) or PR-U groups ( [Formula: see text] days; [Formula: see text],[Formula: see text] ). During the 48-week post-treatment follow-up period, infection reactivation was observed in 15.2% of the MA subjects compared to 17.4% in the PM-MBCL and 10.5% PM-U of subjects diagnosed as clinically healed by 12 weeks ( [Formula: see text] ). The results suggest that although the time required for the clinical healing of ulcerated lesions takes longer, topical paromomycin may be an acceptable therapeutic alternative in endemic areas where meglumine antimoniate is not available, is too costly or medically contraindicated.
机译:这项随机对照研究比较了两种含巴龙霉素的局部用制剂与黄金治疗标准品葡甲胺锑酸盐的治疗效果和安全性,对120例厄瓜多尔溃疡病患者进行了比较。两次巴龙霉素治疗比较是双盲的。第一组(公式):接受溶于软白石蜡基质的15%巴龙霉素加12%甲基苯甲酰氯(PR-MBCL),每天两次,共30天。还用溶解在同一石蜡基质中的15%巴龙霉素加10%尿素(PR-U)将第2组([公式:参见文本])处理30天。根据研究时厄瓜多尔公共卫生部的建议,第3组([配方:参见文字])接受20 mg / kg /天的IM葡甲胺锑酸盐(MA),持续10天。 90%的MA组完成了10天的治疗,而PR-MBCL为72.5%(公式:参见文本)和PM-U的75%(公式为: [请参阅文字],[公式:请参阅文字])治疗方案比MA治疗持续时间长20天的组。与巴马霉素组相比,两个巴龙霉素组的治疗后病灶灼伤,发红,发炎和酸痛更为常见([公式:见正文])。两个巴龙霉素组中与治疗相关的副作用的发生频率相似。开始治疗六周后,MA受试者的临床治愈率为80.6%,而PR-MBCL的为48.3%(公式:参见文本),PM-U组的为40%(公式:参见文本)。 [公式:请参见文字],[公式:请参见文字])。到12周时,与PM-MBCL(79.3%)或PM-U(70%)组相比,MA中临床治愈的受试者的比例(91.7%)没有显着差异([公式:参见文字])。与PM-MBCL中的受试者相比,经过12周临床治愈的经MA治疗的受试者的平均治愈时间([公式:参见文本]天)更快(与[公式:参见文本]天相比,[公式:参见文本]天[公式:[参见文字])或PR-U组([公式:参照文字]天; [公式:参照文字],[公式:参照文字])。在治疗后的48周随访期内,MA患者中15.2%观察到感染重新激活,而在12周内被诊断为临床治愈的PM-MBCL和10.5%PM-U患者中观察到感染重新激活([公式:见文字])。结果表明,尽管溃疡病灶的临床修复需要更长的时间,但是局部巴龙霉素可能是在无法获得抗葡甲胺的地方病,成本太高或医学上禁忌的地方可接受的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号