首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection in Salvage Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer
【24h】

Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection in Salvage Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer

机译:在局部晚期T4食管癌中挽救食管切除术中的预后因子和适当的淋巴结解剖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundA suitable treatment strategy for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 cases has not been established and remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the independent prognostic factors, surgical indications, and optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for T4 esophageal cancer.MethodsOf 803 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the authors' institution from 2006 to March 2018, the study included 33 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with locally advanced T4 cancer. The study examined the baseline attributes and treatment results of these cases and evaluated the prognostic factors and treatment strategies.ResultsThe independent favorable prognostic factors in T4 cancer (T4a/T4b=11/22) included non-T4b status [hazard ratio (HR), 15.311; 95% confidence-interval (CI), 1.277-183.5] and R0 resection (HR, 14.706; 95% CI, 1.193-166.67). For the cases in which R0 resection was possible (n=14), both the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 90.9%, whereas for the cases without R0 dissection (n=19), the 1- and 5-year survival rates were respectively 44.9% and 0%. In the univariate analysis, the patients who underwent two- or three-field lymph node dissection tended to have a better prognosis (p=0.062), and those with 60 or more lymph nodes dissected had a significantly better prognosis (p=0.038). For the patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with typical lymph node dissection, the rate of complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher (33.3%) was not increased, indicating that the procedure was relatively safe.ConclusionsThe results showed that in salvage esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancer, R0 resection led to improved prognosis. Because typical two- or three-field lymph node dissection including prophylactic dissection could be performed safely and led to a better prognosis in salvage esophagectomy, typical esophagectomy including prophylactic lymph node dissection should be performed if possible.
机译:Backgrounta尚未建立在T4案件明确的化学机制后食管癌的合适处理策略并尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明T4食管癌淋巴结切除术的独立预后因素,手术标志性和最佳程度。从2006年到2018年到2018年3月,作者机构接受食管癌食管癌的803例患者,该研究包括33名患者挽救食管切除术,局部晚期T4癌症。该研究检测了这些病例的基线属性和治疗结果,并评估了预后因素和治疗策略.T4癌症(T4A / T4B = 11/22)中的独立良好预后因素进行了非T4B状态[危险比(HR), 15.311; 95%置信间隔(CI),1.277-183.5]和R0切除(HR,14.706; 95%CI,1.193-166.67)。对于r0切除可能(n = 14)的病例,1-岁和5年的存活率均为90.9%,而没有R0解剖(n = 19),1至5年生存利率分别为44.9%和0%。在单变量分析中,接受两种或三场淋巴结解剖的患者倾向于具有更好的预后(p = 0.062),并且淋巴结的淋巴结患者具有明显更好的预后(p = 0.038)。对于患有典型淋巴结解剖进行挽救食管切除术的患者,不增加作为克拉夫 - DindO 3级或更高级别(33.3%)的并发症率没有增加,表明该程序相对安全。结论结果表明,在挽救食管切除术中的结果表明T4食管癌,R0切除导致预后改善。因为可以安全地进行包括预防性解剖的典型的两种或三场淋巴结解剖,并导致挽救食管切除术中的更好预后,如果可能,应在可能的情况下进行包括预防性淋巴结解剖的典型的食管切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号