Response: Feedback Given to Surgeons Is a Useful Tool for Quality Improvement: Demystifying the “Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit”

Olivier Farges; Fran?ois Cauchy

首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Response: Feedback Given to Surgeons Is a Useful Tool for Quality Improvement: Demystifying the “Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit”

【24h】

Response: Feedback Given to Surgeons Is a Useful Tool for Quality Improvement: Demystifying the “Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit”

机译：响应：给外科医生的反馈是一个有用的质量改进工具：揭开“敏感外科医生的结果，没有可衡量的短期利益”

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Annals of Surgery》 |2019年第1期|共2页
作者
Olivier Farges; Fran?ois Cauchy;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of HPB and PancreaticSurgery H?pital Beaujon Assistance Publique H?pitaux de Paris AP;

Department of HPB and PancreaticSurgery H?pital Beaujon Assistance Publique H?pitaux de Paris AP;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类外科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
专利

1. Response: Feedback Given to Surgeons Is a Useful Tool for Quality Improvement: Demystifying the “Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit” [J] . Olivier Farges, Fran?ois Cauchy Annals of Surgery . 2019,第1期

机译：响应：给外科医生的反馈是一个有用的质量改进工具：揭开“敏感外科医生的结果，没有可衡量的短期利益”
2. Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit [J] . Cauchy Francois, Farges Olivier, Vibert Eric, Annals of Surgery . 2017,第5期

机译：敏感外科医生对他们的结果没有可衡量的短期效益
3. The American College of Surgeons Colon Surgery Short-Term Composite Outcome Measure: An Objective, Feasible, and Reliable Tool for Hospital Quality Improvement [J] . Ryan P. Merkow, Bruce L. Hall, Warren B. Chow, Seminars in colon and rectal surgery . 2012,第4期

机译：美国外科医生学院结肠外科短期综合结果评定：改善医院质量的客观，可行和可靠的工具
4. EVALUATION OF A SURGEON-CENTERED LAPAROSCOPIC TOOL DESIGN TO CONVENTIONAL TOOLS [C] . Trejo A.E., Jung M.-C., Oleynikov D., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting . 2005

机译：对以常规工具为中心的腹腔镜腹腔镜工具设计的评估
5. Employment of cardiac surgeons: A study analyzing the cost and quality outcomes at hospitals that employ cardiac surgeons. [D] . Carlson, Greg. 2008

机译：心脏外科医师的聘用：一项分析雇用心脏外科医师的医院的成本和质量结果的研究。
6. The impact of peri-operative blood transfusions on post-pancreatectomy short-term outcomes: an analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [O] . Julie Hallet, Alyson L Mahar, Melanie E Tsang, 2015

机译：围手术期输血对胰腺切除术后短期结局的影响：美国外科医生学院国家外科手术质量改善计划的分析
7. The effectiveness of providing peer benchmarked feedback to hip replacement surgeons based on patient-reported outcome measures—results from the PROFILE (Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feedback Interpretation and Learning Experiment) trial: a cluster randomised controlled study [O] . Boyce Maria B., Browne John P. 2016

机译：根据患者报告的结局指标向髋关节置换手术医生提供同等基准反馈的有效性-来自PROFILE（患者报告的结果：反馈解释和学习实验）试验的结果：一项随机对照研究

Response: Feedback Given to Surgeons Is a Useful Tool for Quality Improvement: Demystifying the “Sensitizing Surgeons to Their Outcome Has No Measurable Short-term Benefit”

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅