...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD)
【24h】

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD)

机译:微创与开放远端胰腺切除术(豹)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: This trial followed a structured nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP), according to the IDEAL framework for surgical innovation, and aimed to compare time to functional recovery after minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Background: MIDP is increasingly used and may enhance postoperative recovery as compared with ODP, but randomized studies are lacking. Methods: A multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled superiority trial was performed in 14 centers between April 2015 and March 2017. Adult patients with left-sided pancreatic tumors confined to the pancreas without vascular involvement were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo MIDP or ODP. Patients were blinded for type of surgery using a large abdominal dressing. The primary endpoint was time to functional recovery. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5689). Results: Time to functional recovery was 4 days [interquartile range (IQR) 3–6) in 51 patients after MIDP versus 6 days (IQR 5–8) in 57 patients after ODP ( P < 0.001). The conversion rate of MIDP was 8%. Operative blood loss was less after MIDP (150 vs 400?mL; P < 0.001), whereas operative time was longer (217 vs 179?minutes; P = 0.005). The Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III complication rate was 25% versus 38% ( P = 0.21). Delayed gastric emptying grade B/C was seen less often after MIDP (6% vs 20%; P = 0.04). Postoperative pancreatic fistulas grade B/C were seen in 39% after MIDP versus 23% after ODP ( P = 0.07), without difference in percutaneous catheter drainage (22% vs 20%; P = 0.77). Quality of life (day 3–30) was better after MIDP as compared with ODP, and overall costs were non-significantly less after MIDP. No 90-day mortality was seen after MIDP versus 2% (n = 1) after ODP. Conclusions: In patients with left-sided pancreatic tumors confined to the pancreas, MIDP reduces time to functional recovery compared with ODP. Although the overall rate of complications was not reduced, MIDP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying and better quality of life without increasing costs.
机译:根据本案件,遵循微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)的课程目的:本试验遵循了结构化全国范围的培训计划,旨在根据外科创新的理想框架,并旨在在微创和开放后在微创和开放后进行功能恢复的时间胰腺切除术(ODP)。背景:越来越多地使用MIDP,并且与ODP相比,可能提高术后恢复,但缺乏随机研究。方法:在2015年4月的14个中心和2017年3月的14个中心进行多中心患者盲目的随机控制优势试验。随机分配(1:1)将左侧胰腺肿瘤局限于胰腺的成年患者(1:1)进行疗程(1:1)以接受MIDP或ODP。使用大型腹部敷料,患者因手术类型而蒙蔽。主要端点是运作恢复的时间。分析是意图治疗。该试验在荷兰试验登记登记(NTR5689)中注册。结果:在DEDP后57名患者的51名患者中,在51名患者中,在51名患者中,功能恢复是4天[四分位数范围(IQR)3-6)的时间(P <0.001)。 MIDP的转​​换率为8%。疗程后,疗效损失较少(150 vs 400?ml; p <0.001),而操作时间较长(217 Vs 179?分钟; p = 0.005)。 Clavien-Dindo≥III并发症率为25%,而38%(p = 0.21)。在MIDP之后较少看到延迟胃排空级B / C(6%vs 20%; p = 0.04)。在ODP(P = 0.07)后MIDP与23%后的39%术后胰腺瘘级B / C在23%(P = 0.07)中,无差异在经皮导管引流(22%Vs 20%; P = 0.77)。与ODP相比,生命质量(第3-30天)在MIDP相比,在MIDP之后,总成本不显着。在ODP之后MIDP与2%(n = 1)之后,在疗程中看到没有90天的死亡率。结论:在围绕胰腺的左侧胰腺肿瘤患者中,与ODP相比,MIDP减少了功能恢复的时间。虽然并发症的总体速率没有减少,但MIDP与胃排空的较少延迟和更好的生活质量有关,而不会增加成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Annals of Surgery》 |2019年第1期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam the;

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam the;

    Department of Surgery St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht;

    Department of Surgery St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht;

    Department of Surgery Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the;

    Department of Surgery Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands and;

    Department of Surgery Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands and;

    Department of Surgery Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede the Netherlands;

    Clinical Research Unit Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery OLVG Amsterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery OLVG Amsterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Catharina Hospital Eindhoven the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the;

    Department of Surgery Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Catharina Hospital Eindhoven the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Isala Clinics Zwolle the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Isala Clinics Zwolle the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK;

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam the;

    Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam the;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

    distal pancreatectomy; IDEAL; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; pancreatic surgery; robot-assisted;

    机译:远端胰腺切除术;理想的;腹腔镜;微创;胰腺手术;机器人辅助;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号