...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >A statistical model-driven surgical case scheduling system improves multiple measures of operative suite efficiency: Findings from a single-center, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A statistical model-driven surgical case scheduling system improves multiple measures of operative suite efficiency: Findings from a single-center, randomized controlled trial

机译:统计模型驱动的外科调度系统提高了操作套件效率的多种措施:从单中心,随机对照试验中的调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We sought to determine whether a data-driven scheduling approach improves Operative Suite (OS) efficiency. Background: Although efficient use of the OS is a critical determinant of access to health care services, OS scheduling methodologies are simplistic and do not account for all the available characteristics of individual surgical cases. Methods: We randomly scheduled cases in a single OS by predicting their length using either the historical mean (HM) duration of the most recent 4 years; or a regression modeling (RM) system that accounted for operative and patient characteristics. The primary endpoint was the imprecision in prediction of the end of the operative day. Secondary endpoints included measures of OS efficiency; personnel burnout captured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory; and a composite endpoint of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, wound infection, bleeding, amputation, or reoperation. Results: Two hundred and seven operative days were allocated to scheduling with either the RM or the HM methodology. Mean imprecision in predicting the end of the operative day was higher with the HM approach (30.8 vs 7.2 minutes, P ?0.024). RM was associated with higher throughput (379 vs 356 cases scheduled over the course of the study, P ?0.04). The composite rate of adverse 30-day events was similar (2.2% vs 3.2%, P ?0.44). The mean depersonalization score was higher (3.2 vs 2.0, P ?0.044), and mean personal accomplishment score was lower during HM weeks (37.5 vs 40.5, P ?0.028). Conclusions: Compared to the HM scheduling approach, the proposed data-driven RM scheduling methodology improves multiple measures of OS efficiency and OS personnel satisfaction without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.
机译:目的:我们试图确定数据驱动调度方法是否提高了操作套件(OS)效率。背景:虽然OS的有效使用是对医疗保健服务的关键决定因素,但操作系统调度方法是简单的,并且不考虑个体外科病例的所有可用特征。方法:通过使用最近4年的历史平均值(HM)持续时间,通过预测其长度来预定单个操作系统中的随机预定案例;或者占操作和患者特征的回归建模(RM)系统。主要终点是在操作日结束时预测的不精确。辅助端点包括OS效率的测量;由Maslach Burnout库存捕获的人员倦怠;和30天死亡率,心肌梗死,伤口感染,出血,截肢或重新进食的综合终点。结果:分配了两百七天的工作日,以与RM或HM方法进行调度。在预测操作日结束时平均不精确与HM方法更高(30.8 Vs 7.2分钟,P?0.024)。 RM与较高的吞吐量相关联(379 VS 356案例,计划在研究过程中,P?0.04)。不良30天事件的复合率相似(2.2%Vs 3.2%,p?0.44)。平均的依托分解得分较高(3.2 Vs 2.0,P?0.044),并且在HM周期间平均个人成就评分较低(37.5 Vs 40.5,P?0.028)。结论:与HM调度方法相比,所提出的数据驱动RM调度方法改善了OS效率和OS人员满意度的多种措施,而不会对临床结果产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号