首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Patient Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes in the Netherlands
【24h】

Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Patient Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes in the Netherlands

机译:椎间动脉瘤患者特征,临床介绍,治疗和结果在荷兰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The aim of this was to analyze differences between saccular-shaped abdominal aortic aneurysms (SaAAAs) and fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysms (FuAAAs) regarding patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome, to advise a threshold for intervention for SaAAAs. Background: Based on the assumption that SaAAAs are more prone to rupture, guidelines suggest early elective treatment. However, little is known about the natural history of SaAAAs and the threshold for intervention is not substantiated. Methods: Observational study including primary repairs of degenerative AAAs in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2018 in which the shape was registered, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA). Patients were stratified by urgency of surgery; elective versus acute (symptomatic/ ruptured). Patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome were compared between SaAAAs and FuAAAs. Results: A total of 7659 primary AAA-patients were included, 6.1% (n = 471) SaAAAs and 93.9% (n = 7188) FuAAAs. There were 5945 elective patients (6.5% SaAAA) and 1714 acute (4.8% SaAAA). Acute SaAAA-patients were more often female (28.9% vs 17.2%, P 0.007) compared with acute FuAAA-patients. SaAAAs had smaller diameters than FuAAAs, in elective (53.0 mm vs 61 mm, P = 0.000) and acute (68 mm vs 75 mm, P = 0.002) patients, even after adjusting for sex. In addition, 25.2% of acute SaAAA-patients presented with diameters <55mm and 8.4% <45mm, versus 8.1% and 0.6% of acute FuAAA-patients (P = 0.000). Postoperative outcomes did not significantly differ between shapes in both elective and acute patients. Conclusions: SaAAAs become acute at smaller diameters than FuAAAs in DSAA patients. This study therefore supports the current idea that SaAAAs should be electively treated at smaller diameters than FuAAAs. The exact diameter threshold for elective treatment of SaAAAs is difficult to determine, but a diameter of 45 mm seems to be an acceptable threshold.
机译:目的:这是为了分析椎弓形腹主动脉瘤(SAAAAS)和梭腹腹主动脉瘤(富塔)关于患者特征,治疗和结果的差异,建议萨安斯干预阈值。背景:基于SaaaAs更容易破裂的假设,指南提出早期选择性待遇。然而,关于SaaAAs的自然历史知之甚少,并且不证实干预的阈值。方法:2016年至2018年荷兰退行性AAAS初级修复的观察研究,其中在荷兰手术动脉瘤审计(DSAA)中注册了形状。患者通过手术紧迫性分层;选择性与急性(症状/破裂)。在Saaaas和Fuaaas之间比较了患者的特征,治疗和结果。结果:共有7659名初级AAA患者,6.1%(n = 471)SAAAAs和93.9%(n = 7188)福亚纳斯。有5945名选修患者(6.5%SAAAA)和1714名急性(4.8%SAAAA)。与急性福达患者相比,急性Saaaa-患者更常见的是女性(28.9%,P <0.007)。 Saaaas直径比FUAAAS更小,在选修(53.0 mm Vs 61 mm,p = 0.000)和急性(68 mm与75mm,p = 0.002)患者中,甚至在调整性时。此外,25.2%的急性Saaaa患者呈现直径<55mm和8.4%<45mm,而不是8.1%和0.6%的急性福达患者(p = 0.000)。术后结果在选修和急性患者中的形状之间没有显着差异。结论:SaaaAs在DSAA患者中比FUAAAS更小的直径变得急剧。因此,该研究支持目前的想法,即应以比FUAAAS更小的直径策划SAAAAS。萨拉斯的选择性治疗的精确直径阈值难以确定,但直径为45毫米似乎是​​可接受的阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号