首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ocean Research >Experiments and CFD of a high-speed deep-V planing hull-Part I: Calm water
【24h】

Experiments and CFD of a high-speed deep-V planing hull-Part I: Calm water

机译:高速深速船体的实验和CFD - 第I部分:平静的水

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparisons of experimental and simulation results for a high-speed deep-V planing hull are presented. The goal of this investigation is to improve the physical understanding of, as well as assess the experimental and CFD capability for, deep-V planing hulls operating in calm water and slamming when running in head waves (both regular and irregular). This paper consists of two parts, which deal with the calm water and slamming in waves, respectively. In Part I, simulations for trim, sinkage, and resistance in calm water are compared with experiments on a deep-V planing hull at the U.S. Naval Academy and at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock. Two model scales of the same geometry were tested in calm water at a range of speeds. Comparisons between the scale models, between the same model tested at both facilities, and comparisons between simulation and experiment are discussed. The results showed the importance of precise geometric (particularly for the transom) and hydrostatic information for simulation predictions. The comparisons also showed the need for greater resolution of the spray root to achieve the best predictions involving trim (and wetted lengths). Overall, there was general agreement between the facilities, even for the calm water trim. The CFDShip-Iowa and STAR-CCM + calm water validation effort was conducted with the larger model results from NSWCCD. Validation was not achieved for resistance; however, Fn average error was less than 4%DR. In sinkage, both codes were validated at the highest three speeds, but not at the lowest speeds (Fn average error was less than 3%DR). For trim and wetted keel, validation was not achieved, although the validation uncertainty values were small (Fn average error was less than 4%DR). Both codes under-predicted the calm water trim and the wetted keel length was under-predicted for all but the lowest speed (Fn average error less than 1). The overall results provide an assessment of the state of the art for both experiments and CFD for high-speed deep-V planing hull resistance, sinkage, and trim. The experimental and simulation results for hull slamming in waves (both regular and irregular) are presented in Part II of this paper.
机译:提出了高速深速船体的实验和仿真结果的比较。该调查的目标是提高对物理理解,并评估Deep-V刨床的实验和CFD能力,在头部波浪中运行时在平静的水中运行和砰的撞击(常规和不规则)。本文分别由两部分组成,分别处理平静的水并在波浪中砰地撞击。在第一部分中,与美国海军学院和海军地面战中心Cardercock的水平刨船的实验相比,在平静的水中进行调整,下沉和抗性的模拟。在一系列速度下,在平静的水中测试了同一几何形状的两个模型尺度。讨论在两种设施测试的相同模型之间的比较模型之间的比较以及仿真与实验之间的比较。结果表明,精确的几何(特别是横梁)和用于模拟预测的静液压信息的重要性。比较还表明需要更大的喷雾根部分辨率,以达到涉及装饰(和湿润长度)的最佳预测。总体而言,设施之间存在一般同意,即使是平静的水饰。 CFDSHIP-IOWA和Star-CCM +平静的水验证工作与NSWCCD的较大模型结果进行了。抵抗验证没有实现;但是,FN平均误差小于4%DR。在沉陷中,两种代码都以最高的三个速度验证,但不是最低速度(FN平均误差小于3%DR)。对于修剪和湿润的龙骨,验证未实现,尽管验证不确定值小(FN平均误差小于4%)。在预测平静的净化尺寸和湿润的龙骨长度之下的两种代码都被预测到所有但最低速度(FN平均误差小于1)。整体结果为高速深度刨床电阻,沉陷和修剪的实验和CFD提供了对现有技术的评估。本文的第二部分II中介绍了波浪中撞击的船体的实验和仿真结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号