首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ocean Research >Comparison of existing methods for the calculation of the infinite water depth free-surface Green function for the wave-structure interaction problem
【24h】

Comparison of existing methods for the calculation of the infinite water depth free-surface Green function for the wave-structure interaction problem

机译:基于波浪结构互动问题计算无限水深自由表面绿色函数的现有方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, the mathematical expressions and numerical methods for the free-surface Green function of the linearized wave-structure problem in deep water and in the frequency domain are investigated. Twelve different expressions are reviewed and analyzed. All these expressions are exact mathematical solutions for the propagation of waves from a pulsating source located in the fluid domain. However, their numerical evaluation is challenging. Dedicated numerical methods have been developed. They include series expansions, polynomials, table interpolations, multipole expansions, approximations with elementary functions, etc. In this work, four methods were implemented: the Newman's method [1], the Delhommeau's method [2], the Telste-Noblesse's method [3] and the Wu et al.'s method [4]. Their CPU time and accuracy are compared. It is found that the average computational time for Newman's method is 5.745 x 10(-7). It is 5.782 x 10(-8) for the Delhommeau's method. For Telste-Noblesse's method and Wu et al.'s methods, they are 4.642 x 10(-8) and 1.491 x 10(-9), respectively. The accuracy is respectively 6D(6 decimals), 5D and 3D for the Newman's method, the Telste-Noblesse's method and the Wu et al.'s method. For the Delhommeau's method, it is 3D except when the vertical coordinate is close to 0. The accuracy of the Delhommeau's method can be increased significantly by refining the discretization of the space variables for the tabulated functions and by using higher interpolation methods, at cost of increased computational time.
机译:在该研究中,研究了深水中线性化波结构问题的自由表面绿色函数的数学表达和数值方法。重新审查并分析了12个不同的表达式。所有这些表达式都是用于从位于流体域中的脉动源传播波的精确数学解决方案。然而,他们的数值评估是具有挑战性的。已经开发了专用的数字方法。它们包括串联扩展,多项式,表插值,多极扩展,具有基本功能的近似值等。在这项工作中,实施了四种方法:纽曼的方法[1],德国的方法[2],Telste-Noblesse的方法[3 ]和wu等人的方法[4]。比较他们的CPU时间和准确性。发现纽曼方法的平均计算时间为5.745 x 10(-7)。德伦欧的方法为5.782 x 10(-8)。对于Telste-Noblesse的方法和Wu等,分别为4.642 x 10(-8)和1.491 x 10(-9)。对于纽曼的方法,Telste-Noblesse的方法和Wu等方法,分别为6D(6位小数),5D和3D。对于Delhommau的方法,除了垂直坐标接近0时,它是3D,通过精制制表功能的空间变量的离散化并使用更高的插值方法,可以显着提高Delhommau方法的准确性。增加计算时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号