首页> 外文期刊>Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences >Body mass estimation in skeletal samples using the hybrid approach: the effect of population-specific variations and sexual dimorphism
【24h】

Body mass estimation in skeletal samples using the hybrid approach: the effect of population-specific variations and sexual dimorphism

机译:使用杂种方法的骨骼样品中体重估计:种群特异性变异和性二晶的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Body mass is estimated from skeletal records with low accuracy, and it is expected that population-specific equations derived by a hybrid approach may help to reduce the error in body mass estimates. We used 204 individuals from five Central European Early Medieval sites to test the effect of population-specific femoral head breadth equations on the accuracy of body mass estimates. The baseline for living body mass was computed using the biiliac breadth and stature. We also analyzed the agreement of five general femoral head techniques that are used in body mass estimation (Elliott et al. (Archaeol Anthropol Sci 1-20, 2015b; Grine et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 97:151-185, 1995); McHenry (Am J Phys Anthropol 87:407-431, 1992); Ruff et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 148:601-617, 2012); Ruff et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 86:397, 1991)). Our results support previous findings showing that body mass is predicted with lower accuracy than stature, even when population-specific equations are derived. However, the population-specific approach increases the agreement with the body mass estimated from the biiliac breadth and stature, particularly when sex-specific equations are used. Thus, our results advocate for the employment of sex-specific equations when possible and show that the possibility of deriving equation for each sex separately is the main advantage of the population-specific approach. The best agreement among the body mass techniques in the Central European Early Medieval samples was observed using the femoral head equations reported by Ruff et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 148:601-617, 2012) and McHenry (Am J Phys Anthropol 87:407-431, 1992), whereas other studied equations provided lower agreement. The particularly low performance obtained using the technique reported by Elliott et al. (2015b) questioned the use of their equations to estimate body masses.
机译:体重从精度低的骨骼记录估计,预计通过混合方法导出的群体特定方程可能有助于降低体重估计的误差。我们使用了来自五个中欧早期中世纪的204个个人,以测试人口特定的股骨头宽度方程对体重估计的准确性的影响。使用生物带宽和身材来计算生活体重的基线。我们还分析了五种在体重估计中使用的五种股骨头技术的协议(Elliott等人(Archaeol Anthroper SCI 1-20,2015B; Grine等人)(AM J Phys Anthroper 97:151-185,1995) ; MCHENRY(AM J Phys Anthrop 87:407-431,1992); Ruff等人(AM J Phys Anthopol 148:601-617,2012); Ruff等人。(AM J Phys Anthroplop 86:397,1991)) 。我们的结果支持以前的发现表明,即使群体特定方程式,也可以通过比身材更低的精度来预测体重。然而,人口特定方法将与诸如生物免线宽度和身材的体重估计的达成协议。当使用特定的性别方程时,我们的结果倡导在可能的情况下倡导性别特定的方程,并表明分别为每种性行为导出方程的可能性是人口特定方法的主要优势。最佳协议欧洲欧洲群体的体重技术使用Ruff等人报道的股骨头方程观察到EAN早期的中世纪样本。 (am j Phys Anthrop 148:601-617,2012)和MCHENRY(AM J Phys Anthrop 87:407-431,1992),而其他研究方程则提供了较低的协议。使用Elliott等人报告的技术获得的特别低的性能。 (2015B)质疑使用它们的方程来估计体积。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号