首页> 外文期刊>Applied Spectroscopy: Society for Applied Spectroscopy >Method Transfer Evaluation for Digital Derivative Spectrophotometry Through its Resolution Parameter Comparison of Different Computer Programs
【24h】

Method Transfer Evaluation for Digital Derivative Spectrophotometry Through its Resolution Parameter Comparison of Different Computer Programs

机译:方法转移评估数字衍生分光光度法通过其分辨率参数比较不同计算机程序的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The application assessment of different programs was performed with equivalence tests for method transfer pro second-order derivative spectrophotometry. The digital second-order derivative spectra were calculated on different instruments; GBC Scientific Equipment Cintra 20 (Cintral v.2.6 and Spectral v.1.70 software programs) and Thermo Scientific Evolution 300 (VISIONPro software) were analyzed using the amplitude A/B ratio (A = D-2(265,263); B = D-2(263,261)). Amplitude A/B ratio is the resolution parameter for derivative spectrophotometry prescribed in European Pharmacopoeia. The obtained values for A/B ratio were either very similar or significantly different among programs: 0.669 (Cintral v.2.6), 0.549 (Spectral v.1.70), 0.556 (medium indirect VISIONPro), 0.557 (one-step Savitzky-Golay 7 VISIONPro), 0.689 (two-step Savitzky-Golay 7 VISIONPro). Method transfer was possible between Spectral v.1.70 and VISIONPro (medium indirect and one-step Savitzky-Golay 7), but the values obtained in Cintral v.2.6 were not comparable to the other programs. The absorbance data exported from both instruments were additionally calculated in OriginPro8 which provided almost the same mean A/B values (0.627 Cintral v.2.6; 0.624 VISIONPro), confirming that the two instruments recorded the same zero-order spectra. The calculation of resolution parameter could be used for verification of program comparison, which would enable transfer between sender and receiver laboratory. The accordance between program algorithms was confirmed when acceptable differences for values of resolution parameter (A/B ratios) were achieved.
机译:使用对方法转移Pro二阶衍生分光光度法进行不同程序的应用评估。数字二阶衍生光谱在不同的仪器上计算;使用幅度A / B比(A = D-2(265,263)分析GBC科学设备Cintra 20(Cintral v.2.6和光谱V.1.70软件程序)和Thermo Scientific Evolution 300(VisionPro软件); B = D- 2(263,261))。振幅A / B比是欧洲药典中规定的衍生分光光度法的分辨率参数。在方案中获得的A / B比的值非常相似或显着不同:0.669(Cintral v.2.6),0.549(光谱v.1.70),0.556(媒体间接Visionpro),0.557(一步救酷 - Golay 7 VisionPro),0.689(两步Savitzky-Golay 7 VisionPro)。在光谱V.1.70和VisionPro(介质间接和一步Savitzky-golay 7)之间可以进行方法转移,但在CINTRAL v.2.6中获得的值与其他程序没有比较。从两个仪器导出的吸光度数据另外计算在OriginPro8中,提供几乎相同的平均值A / B值(0.627 Cintral v.2.6; 0.624 VisionPro),确认这两种仪器记录了相同的零级光谱。分辨率参数的计算可用于验证程序比较,这将能够在发件人和接收者实验室之间传输。当达到分辨率参数(A / B比率)的可接受差异时,确认了按键的算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号