首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soft Computing >Location optimization for multiple types of charging stations for electric scooters
【24h】

Location optimization for multiple types of charging stations for electric scooters

机译:用于电动滑板车多种充电站的位置优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The difference between traditional scooters and electric scooters is the convenience of refueling and charging process. Designing a complete infrastructure system is a necessary step if efforts to promote e-scooters are to meet with success. This study discusses the optimal location problem of locating charging stations which is generally considered a location-allocation problem. There are two types of charging stations: charge stations and battery-exchange stations. The only one model in determining the location of either type of station tends to decrease the traditional utility compared to compound model traditional as this method tends not to set stations where they would serve the greatest number of customers. In addition, population density and land cost should be taken into account in determining where stations are set. We, therefore, propose a method that accounts for differences in population density and land cost in order to solve a multi-objective problem with maximum utility at minimum cost. A mathematical model is developed in which constraints pertaining to capacity and distance are considered. To find an optimal parameter for Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), generational distance (GD), maximum spread, spacing, and diversity metrics are applied. Finally, we research an angle-based focus method and determine the extent to which stations would be used in order to determine the optimal proportions of charging stations and battery-exchange stations. Moreover, according to the analysis we found that the installed ratio model of BES/BCS (Battery-exchange stations/Battery charging stations) is 6:5 in the downtown area and 1:6 in the outskirts of high population density areas. Besides, the BES/BCS ratio model is 1:13 in the downtown and only BCSs are installed in the outskirts of the low population density area. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:传统踏板车和电动滑板车之间的差异是加油和充电过程的便利性。设计完整的基础设施系统是一个必要的步骤,如果促进电子踏板车的努力是为了成功而满足。本研究讨论了定位充电站的最佳位置问题,其通常被认为是位置分配问题。有两种类型的充电站:充电站和电池交换站。在传统的复合模型相比,确定任一类型车站位置的唯一模型往往会降低传统的实用程序,因为这种方法倾向于设置他们为最多客户提供最多的站点。此外,应在确定设定的车站时应考虑人口密度和土地成本。因此,我们提出了一种方法,该方法占人口密度和土地成本的差异,以便以最低成本解决最大效用的多目标问题。开发了一种数学模型,其中考虑了与容量和距离有关的约束。为了找到多目标粒子群优化(MOPSO),世代距离(GD),最大扩展,间距和分集度量的最佳参数。最后,我们研究了基于角度的焦点方法,并确定将使用该站的范围来确定充电站和电池交换站的最佳比例。此外,根据分析,我们发现,在市中心区域的BES / BCS(电池交换站/电池充电站)的安装比率模型为6:5,在高人口密度区域的郊区中为1:6。此外,BES / BCS比率模型是在市中心的1:13,只有BCS安装在低人口密度区域的郊区。 (c)2018 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号