...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Pasture dry matter intake per cow in intensive dairy production systems: effects of grazing and feeding management
【24h】

Pasture dry matter intake per cow in intensive dairy production systems: effects of grazing and feeding management

机译:在密集的乳制品生产系统中每头牛的牧场干物质摄入量:放牧和喂养管理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The competitiveness and sustainability of low input cost dairy production systems are generally supported by efficient use of pasture in the diets. Therefore, pasture intake directly affects overall efficiency of these systems. We aimed to assess feeding and grazing management main factors that affect pasture dry matter intake (DMI) in commercial dairy farms during the different seasons of the year. Fortnightly visits to 28 commercial dairies were carried out between June 2016 and May 2017 to record production and price, supplement offered and price, pasture access time (PAT), herbage mass (HM) and allowance (HA). Only farms with the most contrasting estimated pasture DMI per cow (eDMI) were compared as systems with high (HPI; N = 8) or low (LPI; N = 8) pasture DMI. Despite a lower individual milk production in HPI than LPI (19.0 v. 23.3 ± 0.7 l/cow, P < 0.01), daily margin over feeding cost was not different between groups (3.07 v. 2.93 ± 0.15 U$S/cow for HPI and LPI, respectively). During autumn and winter, HPI cows ingested more pasture than LPI cows (8.3 v. 4.6 and 5.9 v. 2.9 ± 0.55 kg DM/cow per day, respectively, P < 0.01) although PAT, HM and HA were similar between groups. Both groups offered high supplementation levels during these seasons, even though greater in LPI than HPI (14.7 v. 9.7 ± 0.7 kg DM supplement/cow per day, respectively, P < 0.01). On the other hand, differences between groups for both pasture and supplement DMI were more contrasting during spring and summer (13.1 v. 7.3 ± 0.5 and 4.0 v. 11.4 ± 0.4 kg DM/cow per day for HPI and LPI, respectively, P < 0.01), with higher PAT in both seasons (P < 0.05) and higher HA during summer in HPI than LPI (P < 0.01). Unlike LPI, during these seasons HPI adjusted offered supplement according to HA, achieving a higher pasture eDMI and making more efficient use of available pastoral resource than LPI. As there was no grazing limiting condition for pasture harvesting in either group, the main factor affecting pasture DMI was a pasture by supplement substitution effect. These results reinforce the importance of an efficient grazing management, and using supplements to nutritionally complement pasture intake rather than as a direct way to increase milk production.
机译:低投入成本乳制品生产系统的竞争力和可持续性通常通过在饮食中有效使用牧场来支持。因此,牧场摄入直接影响这些系统的整体效率。我们的旨在评估在年度不同季节的商业乳制品农场中影响牧草干物质摄入(DMI)的饲养和放牧管理主要因素。每两周一次访问28次商业乳房于2016年6月和2017年5月在2017年之间进行,以记录生产和价格,补充提供和价格,牧场访问时间(PAT),牧草质量(HM)和津贴(HA)。将唯一对比具有最鲜明对比的牧场牧场DMI(EDMI)的农场被比较为具有高(HPI; N = 8)或低(LPI; N = 8)牧场DMI的系统。尽管HPI的单独牛奶产量低于LPI(19.0 v.23.3±0.7升/牛,P <0.01),但组之间的每日余量在组之间没有差异(3.07 v。2.93±0.15 U $ S / COW供HPI和LPI分别)。在秋季和冬季,HPI奶牛比LPI奶牛摄入更多的牧场(8.3 v.4.6和5.9 v。每天2.9±0.55千克DM /牛,P <0.01),但在组之间是相似的。两组两组在这些季节提供了高的补充水平,即使LPI更大,也比HPI更大(14.7 v.9.7±0.7公斤DM补充/牛,分别为P <0.01)。另一方面,牧场和补充DMI的群体之间的差异在春季和夏季(13.1 v.7.3±0.5和4.0 v.11.4±0.4kg DM / DI,分别为HPI和LPI,P < 0.01),在HPI的夏季比LPI夏季季节(P <0.05)和更高的HA(P <0.01)。与LPI不同,在这些季节期间,HPI根据HA调整了提供的补充剂,实现了更高的牧场EDMI,并比LPI更有效地使用了可用的牧场资源。由于两组牧场收获没有放牧条件,影响牧场DMI的主要因素是补充替代效应的牧场。这些结果强化了高效放牧管理的重要性,并使用补充剂来营养补充牧场摄入,而不是增加牛奶生产的直接方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号