首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review to Assess Critical Bone Loss Amounts
【24h】

Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review to Assess Critical Bone Loss Amounts

机译:双极性骨质损失的复发前肩部稳定性:评估临界骨质损失量的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: There is increasing evidence to suggest that the amount of glenoid bone loss to indicate bone block procedures may be lower than previously thought, particularly in the presence of a Hill-Sachs defect. Purpose: To better establish treatment recommendations for anterior shoulder instability among patients with bipolar bone lesions. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed with PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies evaluating outcomes of operative management in anterior shoulder instability that also reported glenoid bone loss in the presence of Hill-Sachs defects were included. Recurrence rates, glenoid bone loss, and humeral bone loss were pooled and analyzed with forest plots stratified by surgical procedure. Methods of quantification were analyzed for each article qualitatively. Results: Thirteen articles were included in the final analysis, with a total of 778 patients. The mean +/- SD age was 24.9 +/- 8.6 years. The mean follow-up was 30.1 months (range, 11-240 months). Only 13 of 408 (3.2%) reviewed bipolar bone loss articles quantified humeral and/or glenoid bone loss. Latarjet procedures had the greatest glenoid bone loss (21.7%; 95% CI, 14.8%-28.6%), followed by Bankart repairs (13.1%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.2%), and remplissage (11.7%; 95% CI, 5.5%-18.0%). Humeral bone loss was primarily reported as percentage bone loss (22.2%; 95% CI, 13.1%-31.3% in Bankart repairs and 31.7%; 95% CI, 21.6%-41.1% in Latarjet) or as volumetric defects (439.1 mm(3); 95% CI, 336.3-541.9 mm(3) in Bankart repairs and 366.0 mm(3); 95% CI, 258.4-475.4 mm(3) in remplissage). Recurrence rates were as follows: Bankart repairs, 19.5% (95% CI, 14.5%-25.8%); remplissage, 4.4% (95% CI, 1.3%-14.0%); and Latarjet, 8.7% (95% CI, 5.0%-14.7%). Bankart repairs were associated with significantly greater recurrence of instability in included articles (P = .013). Conclusion: There exists a need for universal and consistent preoperative measurement of humeral-sided bone loss. The presence of concomitant Hill-Sachs defects with glenoid pathology should warrant more aggressive operative management through use of bone block procedures. Previously established values of critical glenoid bone loss are not equally relevant in the presence of bipolar bone loss.
机译:背景:越来越多的证据表明,关节骨损失量表明骨块手术可能低于先前认为,特别是在山丘缺陷的存在下。目的:更好地建立双极性骨病变患者前肩部不稳定性的治疗建议。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析;证据级别,4.方法:根据PRISMA(优选的系统评价和META分析)指导方针,对文献进行了系统审查。研究前肩部不稳定性的术治疗结果评估,也包括在山丘缺陷存在下报告的胶质骨损失。汇集了呼吸率,胶质骨损伤和肱骨骨质损失,并分析了通过外科手术分层的森林图。定性分析了每种文章的定量方法。结果:第三篇文章含量在最终分析中,共有778名患者。平均+/- SD年龄为24.9 +/- 8.6岁。平均随访30.1个月(范围,11-240个月)。只有408(3.2%)的综述肱骨和/或眼盂骨损失仅有13个(3.2%)。 Latarjet程序具有最大的胶质骨损失(21.7%; 95%CI,14.8%-28.6%),其次是钞票维修(13.1%; 95%CI,9.0%-17.2%)和Remplissage(11.7%; 95% CI,5.5%-18.0%)。肱骨骨质损失主要报告为骨损失率(22.2%;纸币维修的22.2%; 95%-31.3%,31.7%; Latarjet的95%-41.1%,21.6%-41.1%)或体积缺陷(439.1mm( 3);纸币维修中95%CI,336.3-541.9 mm(3),366.0 mm(3); 95%CI,258.4-475.4毫米(3)在Remplissage)。复发率如下:银行家维修,19.5%(95%CI,14.5%-25.8%); Remplissage,4.4%(95%CI,1.3%-14.0%);和Latarjet,8.7%(95%CI,5.0%-14.7%)。银行家维修与包括文章中的不稳定性重复有关(P = .013)。结论:需要普遍性和一致的术前测量肱骨侧面损失。伴随山脉缺陷的存在与关节盂病理学的缺陷应通过使用骨块程序来保证更具侵略性的手术管理。以前建立的关键关骨骨损失的值在双极性骨质损失存在下并不同样相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号