...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Time patients spend in the emergency department: England's 4-hour rule - A case of hitting the target but missing the point?
【24h】

Time patients spend in the emergency department: England's 4-hour rule - A case of hitting the target but missing the point?

机译:时间患者在急诊部门花费:英格兰的4小时规则 - 一个击中目标但错过了这一点的情况?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study objective: To address concerns about prolonged emergency department (ED) stays from crowding, England mandated that the maximum length of ED stay for 98% of patients be no greater than 4 hours. We evaluate the effect of the mandated ED care intervals in England. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of ED patient throughput before, during, and after implementation of the target. Fifteen acute hospital trusts' ED data were purposively sampled, including all patient visits during May and June of 2003 to 2006. We compared total time in ED and time to clinician across years, segregating for admitted versus discharged patients and young versus old patients, using a random-effects regression model and adjusting for hospital clustering. Results: We analyzed 735,588 ED visits. The proportion of patients seen and treated within 4 hours improved from 83.9% to 96.3%. Adjusted total length of ED stay from 2003 to 2006 increased by 8.6 minutes for all patients and 30 minutes for admissions; time to physician improved by 1 minute for all patients. The proportion of patients leaving the ED during the last 20 minutes before 4 hours increased from 4.7% of all patients in 2003 to 8.4% in 2006. Admitted patients were more likely than discharged ones to leave the ED in the last 20 minutes, and the relative likelihood increased each year after 2003, with incidence rate ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.39), 1.39 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.82), and 1.55 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.20) for 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. An increasing proportion of elderly patients were in the last 20-minute departure interval each year compared with younger patients (in 2003 7.4% versus 4.1%; in 2006 17.3% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: The introduction of a time target reduced the proportion of patients staying greater than 4 hours. More patients departed within 20 minutes of the target 4-hour interval after the mandate, notably, the elderly.
机译:学习目标:为了满足长期急诊部门(ED)的担忧,英国授权ED的最高长度为98%的患者不超过4小时。我们评估了英格兰授权的ED护理间隔的效果。方法:这是对目标前,期间和之后的ED患者吞吐量的回顾性分析。五十急性医院信托的ED数据被禁用抽样,包括2003年5月至2006年5月至2006年5月至2006年的所有患者访问。我们将ED和时间的总时间与多年的临床医生进行了比较,用于录取的患者与出院患者和年轻患者的患者,使用一种随机效应回归模型和医院聚类调整。结果:我们分析了735,588次申请。 4小时内观察和治疗的患者的比例从83.9%提高至96.3%。所有患者的2003年至2006年,ED住宿的总长度增加了8.6分钟,录取30分钟;所有患者的医生都有1分钟的时间。在过去20分钟前4小时前20分钟患者的比例从2003年所有患者的4.7%增加到2006年的8.4%。承认患者比排放的患者在过去20分钟内留下ed,以及2003年后的相对可能性每年增加,发病率比为1.04(95%置信区间[CI] 0.78至1.39),1.39(95%CI 1.05至1.82),2004年,2005年的1.55(95%CI 1.19至2.20)和2006年分别。与年轻患者相比,每年的过去20分钟的患者越来越多的老年患者(2003年的7.4%对4.1%; 2006年的17.3%对6.3%)。结论:引入时间目标降低了患者的比例超过4小时。在任务后,更多患者在目标4小时间隔后20分钟内离开,特别是老人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号