首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the American Thoracic Society >Comparison of dominant hand to non-dominant hand in conduction of reaching task from 3D kinematic data: Trade-off between successful rate and movement efficiency
【24h】

Comparison of dominant hand to non-dominant hand in conduction of reaching task from 3D kinematic data: Trade-off between successful rate and movement efficiency

机译:从3D运动学数据传导达到任务中的非主导手的比较:成功率和运动效率之间的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to investigate the effects of handedness on motion accuracies and to compare 3D kinematic data in reaching performance of dominant and non-dominant hand with the influence of movement speed and target locations. Twelve healthy young adults used self-selected and fast speed to reach for three different target locations as follows: frontal, ipsilateral and contralateral to the performing hand, with equal distance. Both hands were tested and kinematic parameters were recorded by 3D motion analysis system. Successful rate, reach path ratio, mean and peak velocity, the timing of peak velocity and ROM of joints were analyzed. Reach path ratio was smaller when using the dominant hand (p < 0.01) and fast speed (p < 0.01) to perform the movement, but the successful rate of the dominant hand was lower than non-dominant hand during fast speed reaching (99.1% vs 100%). Contralateral movement had lower velocity than the other two target locations, while velocity did not vary between non-dominant and dominant hand. The timing of peak velocity occurred significantly later for fast speed movements (p < 0.01). Trunk rotation was significantly smaller when using the dominant hand, fast movement speed or reaching to the ipsilateral target. The ROM of elbow and wrist flexion-extension decreased in contralateral reaching. The performance of the dominant hand and/or fast speed movements was more efficient with straighter hand path and less trunk rotation, but the successful rate decreased in dominant hand during fast speed movements. The timing of peak velocity occurred later during fast movement in both hands indicating a decreased feedback phase. Target location can influence movement strategy as reaching to contralateral target required more proximal movements and ipsilateral reaching used more distal segment movements.
机译:本研究旨在调查手工对运动准确性的影响,并比较3D运动学数据在移动速度和目标位置的影响下达到主导和非主导手的性能。十二个健康的年轻成年人使用自我选择和快速速度达到三个不同的目标位置,如下所示:正面,同侧和对侧的表演手,具有相同的距离。双手经过测试,3D运动分析系统记录了运动学参数。分析了成功率,达到路径比,平均值和峰值速度,分析了关节峰值速度和ROM的时间。使用优势手(P <0.01)和快速(P <0.01)进行运动时达到路径比率较小,但在快速达到时,优势手的成功率低于非显性手(99.1%) vs 100%)。对侧运动的速度低于其他两个目标位置,而非显性和优势手的速度没有变化。峰值速度的定时显着发生,以便快速运动(P <0.01)。使用优势手,快速移动速度或达到同侧目标时,树干旋转明显更小。肘部和手腕屈曲 - 延伸的rom在对侧到达下降。主导手和/或快速运动的性能更有效率,具有更直的手径和较少的躯干旋转,但在快速运动期间,成功的速率在显性手中减少。在两只手中的快速运动中稍后发生峰值速度的定时,指示反馈阶段减少。目标位置可以影响移动策略,因为达到对侧目标所需的更近似运动和同侧达到更多远端段运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号