首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the American Thoracic Society >Power Calculations to Select Instruments for Clinical Trial Secondary Endpoints - A Case Study of Instrument Selection for Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Subjects with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
【24h】

Power Calculations to Select Instruments for Clinical Trial Secondary Endpoints - A Case Study of Instrument Selection for Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Subjects with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

机译:用于选择临床试验次级终点的仪器的功率计算 - 一种急性呼吸窘迫综合征主体后创伤后应激症状仪器选择的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Rationale: After the sample size of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is set by the power requirement of its primary endpoint, investigators select secondary endpoints while unable to further adjust sample size. How the sensitivity and specificity of an instrument used to measure these outcomes, together with their expected underlying event rates, affect an RCT's power to measure significant differences in these outcomes is poorly understood. Objectives: Motivated by the design of an RCT of neuromuscular blockade in acute respiratory distress syndrome, we examined how power to detect a difference in secondary endpoints varies with the sensitivity and specificity of the instrument used to measure such outcomes. Methods: We derived a general formula and Stata code for calculating an RCT's power to detect differences in binary outcomes when such outcomes are measured with imperfect sensitivity and specificity. The formula informed the choice of instrument for measuring post-traumatic stress-like symptoms in the Reevaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade RCT (www.clinicaltrials. gov identifier NCT02509078). Measurements and Main Results: On the basis of published sensitivities and specificities, the Impact of Events Scale-Revised was predicted to measure a 36% symptom rate, whereas the Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms instrument was predicted to measure a 23% rate, if the true underlying rate of post-traumatic stress symptoms were 25%. Despite its lower sensitivity, the briefer Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms instrument provided superior power to detect a difference in rates between trial arms, owing to its higher specificity. Conclusions: Examining instruments' power to detect differences in outcomes may guide their selection when multiple instruments exist, each with different sensitivities and specificities.
机译:基本原理:随机临床试验(RCT)的样本大小由其主要端点的功率要求设定,调查人员选择辅助端点,同时无法进一步调整样品大小。用于衡量这些结果的仪器的敏感性和特异性以及其预期的潜在事件率影响RCT的权力,以衡量这些结果中的显着差异。目的:通过急性呼吸窘迫综合征的神经血清障碍RCT设计,我们检查了检测次级端点差异的力量如何随着用于测量这种结果的仪器的敏感性和特异性而变化。方法:我们派生通式和STATA代码,用于计算RCT的功率,以检测不同敏感性和特异性的这种结果。该公式通知了用于测量系统性早期神经肌肉封闭RCT的重新评估的创伤后应激症状的仪器(www.clinictrials。Gov标识符NCT02509078)。测量和主要结果:在公布的敏感性和特异性的基础上,预计会测量事件的影响是测量的36%症状率,而创伤后应力症状仪器预计衡量23%的速度,如果是创伤后应激症状的真正潜在率为25%。尽管灵敏度较低,但前创伤后应力症状仪器仪器提供了卓越的力量,以检测试验臂之间的差异,由于其更高的特异性。结论:检查仪器的权力检测结果的差异可能引导它们的选择,每个仪器存在不同的敏感性和特殊性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号