首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Evaluation of six equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimating using public weather forecast message for different climate regions across China
【24h】

Evaluation of six equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimating using public weather forecast message for different climate regions across China

机译:对中国不同气候区公共天气预报估算每日参考蒸发估算六方程的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ET0) are vital for water resource management and irrigation decision-making. Based on the public weather forecasts, numerous models have been successfully used for daily ET0 estimating, while too many models available for selection, which causes confusion regarding model selection for specific climate regions. In this paper, the estimating performances of six ET0 equations using public weather forecast for a lead time of 1-7 days were compared for four main climatic region across China, and then, the most accurate equation was recommended for each climate region. Meanwhile, the applicability of every equation was assessed in relation to four climates, including subtropical monsoon climate (Cwa), temperate continental climate (Dfc), temperate monsoon climate (Dwa) and mountain plateau climate (HG). The Penman-Monteith Forecast (PMF) equation, which consisting of an adaptation of FAO56-PM equation using temperature and weather type forecast as inputs, provided the best ET0 estimation performance in Cwa and HG climates; and the Temperature Penman-Monteith (PMT) equation using only the temperature data, obtained the most accurate average results for the Dwa and Dfc climates. The best and the second best estimation performance for each climate usually provided by PMF and PMT equations, since they both have the same advantage of following the conceptual approach of the FAO56-PM equation; further the third and the fourth choice would be the Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and the Blaney-Criddle (BC), respectively, while the Thornwaite (TH) and the McCloud (MC) yielded high errors and may not be applicable for ET0 estimation for most climatic regions. As a whole, the PMF and PMT equations were better than the other equations and thus these two equations were recommended for daily ET0 estimation for the near-future at all climate regions across China.
机译:准确估计日常参考蒸散(ET0)对水资源管理和灌溉决策至关重要。基于公共天气预报,众多模型已成功用于每日ET0估算,而太多型号可供选择,这导致对特定气候区域的模型选择引起混淆。在本文中,将六个ET0方程的估算表演在中国的四个主要气候区域比较了1-7天的延长时间,然后,每个气候区域建议最准确的等式。同时,各方程的适用性与四个气候有关,包括亚热带季风气候(CWA),温带大陆气候(DFC),温带季风气候(DWA)和山地平原气候(HG)。 Penman-Monteith(PMF)方程(PMF)方程组成,它使用温度和天气型预测作为输入的FAO56-PM方程式,为CWA和HG气候中提供了最佳的ET0估计性能;和仅使用温度数据的温度Penman-Monteith(PMT)方程,获得了DWA和DFC气候的最准确的平均结果。每个气候通常由PMF和PMT方程提供的最佳和第二个最佳估计性能,因为它们都具有与FAO56-PM方程的概念方法相同的优势;此外,第三个和第四选择将分别是哈尔格雷物 - 萨米(HS)和Blaney-Cridle(BC),而ThornWaite(Th)和McCloud(MC)产生高误差,并且可能不适用于ET0估计对于大多数气候区域。总的来说,PMF和PMT方程比其他方程更好,因此建议这两个方程用于每日ET0估算中国各地的所有气候区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号