首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Situation in India >Farmers' Participation in India's Futures Markets: Potential, Experience andConstraints
【24h】

Farmers' Participation in India's Futures Markets: Potential, Experience andConstraints

机译:农民参与印度的期货市场:潜力,经验和混合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Improving agricultural marketing and reducing price risk for India's small and marginal farmers has been an important policy agenda for several decades (Chand 2012; Sahadevan, 2012). Although the government has made considerable efforts to improve themarket linkages for smallholders, the direct benefits especially in price risk management, except for support prices, have remained somewhat limited. Though the government policy has aimed at protecting small farmers from market and other failures, thishas often not worked due to various reasons including 'elite capture' and 'social exclusion' such as in cooperative and other institutions (Feder et al., 2011). Since 2000s, there has been increased policy thrust on improving small holder market accessand risk management (Acharya, 2004; Ranjan, 2005). Development of commodity futures and forward markets is one outcome of this market- oriented approach. Futures trading in India has seen various structural improvisations in the recent years and there has been effort to improve the performance of commodity exchanges, thereby enhancing trading and market efficiency. However, futures trading in agricultural commodities has not yet attracted significant participation especially of producers. While the futures markets should help in price discover)' and risk management, there is considerable debate in India on its usefulness and impact. The Forward Markets Commission (FMC) has recently been replaced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as the commodity derivative market regulator. This may offer a new scope for improving participation in agricultural commodity derivative markets (Ghosh and Dey, 2015).
机译:提高农业营销和降低印度小型农民的价格风险已经是几十年(2012年的Chand 2012; Sahadevan,2012)是一个重要的政策议程。虽然政府努力改善小企业的联系,但特别是在价格风险管理中,除了支付价格外,仍然存在有些有限的福利。虽然政府政策旨在保护来自市场和其他故障的小农,但由于包括“精英捕获”和“社会排斥”,如合作和其他机构(Feder等,2011),这往往没有奏效。自2000年代以来,在改善小型持有人的市场访问和风险管理(Acharya,2004; Ranjan,2005)的情况下,有更多的政策推动。商品期货和转发市场的发展是这种市场导向方法的一个结果。近年来,印度的期货交易在近年来各种结构上升,并一直努力提高商品交易所的表现,从而提高交易和市场效率。然而,农业商品的期货交易尚未吸引专门对生产者的重要参与。虽然期货市场应该有所帮助,但是风险管理,在印度有相当大的辩论,以其有用和影响。前锋市场委员会(FMC)最近被印度的证券和交流委员会(SEBI)作为商品衍生市场监管机构所取代。这可能为改善农业商品衍生市场的参与(Ghosh和Dey,2015)提供新的范围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Agricultural Situation in India》 |2019年第5期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Management in Agriculture Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad;

    Centre for Management in Agriculture Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad;

    Centre for Management in Agriculture Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号