首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Association Between Race and Ethnicity in the Delivery of Regional Anesthesia for Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Study of 3189 Regional Anesthetics in 25,664 Surgeries
【24h】

Association Between Race and Ethnicity in the Delivery of Regional Anesthesia for Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Study of 3189 Regional Anesthetics in 25,664 Surgeries

机译:在贸易和种族交付儿科患者区域麻醉中的协会:在25,664名手术中为3189个区域麻醉剂进行一次中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care are well documented in the United States, although evidence of disparities in pediatric anesthesia is limited. We sought to determine whether there is an association between race and ethnicity and the use of intraoperative regional anesthesia at a single academic children's hospital. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all anesthetics at an academic tertiary children's hospital between May 4, 2014, and May 31, 2018. The primary outcome was delivery of regional anesthesia, defined as a neuraxial or peripheral nerve block. The association between patient race and ethnicity (white non-Hispanic or minority) and receipt of regional anesthesia was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed comparing white non-Hispanic to an expansion of the single minority group to individual racial and ethnic groups and on patients undergoing surgeries most likely to receive regional anesthesia (orthopedic and urology patients). RESULTS: Of 33,713 patient cases eligible for inclusion, 25,664 met criteria for analysis. Three-thousand one-hundred eighty-nine patients (12.4%) received regional anesthesia. One thousand eighty-six of 8884 (13.3%) white non-Hispanic patients and 2003 of 16,780 (11.9%) minority patients received regional anesthesia. After multivariable adjustment for confounding, race and ethnicity were not found to be significantly associated with receiving intraoperative regional anesthesia (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.06;P= .36). Sensitivity analyses did not find significant differences between the white non-Hispanic group and individual races and ethnicities, nor did they find significant differences when analyzing only orthopedic and urology patients, despite observing some meaningful clinical differences. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients undergoing surgical anesthesia at a single academic children's hospital, race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with the adjusted ORs of receiving intraoperative regional anesthesia. This finding contrasts with much of the existing health care disparities literature and warrants further study with additional datasets to understand the mechanisms involved.
机译:背景:在美国的卫生保健中的种族和种族差异在美国良好,虽然儿科麻醉的差异有限。我们试图确定种族和种族之间是否存在协会,也是在一个学术儿童医院使用术中的内部麻醉。方法:我们在2014年5月4日和2018年5月31日之间对学术三级儿童医院的所有麻醉剂进行了回顾性审查。主要结果是递送区域麻醉,定义为神经周围神经阻滞。使用多变量逻辑回归评估患者种族和种族(白人非西班牙裔或少数民族或少数民族)和接收区域麻醉之间的关联。进行了敏感性分析,将白色非西班牙裔对单一少数民族群体扩展进行了比较,对个人种族和族群以及接受最有可能接受区域麻醉(矫形和泌尿外科患者)的手术的患者。结果:33,713名患者案件有资格纳入,25,664符合分析标准。三千一百八十九九患者(12.4%)接受了区域麻醉。 8884(13.3%)的一千八十六六(13.3%)白色非西班牙裔患者,2003年为16,780名(11.9%)少数民族患者接受了区域麻醉。经过多变量调整的混淆,没有发现种族和种族与接受术中的区域麻醉有显着相关(调整后的含量比率[或者] = 0.95; 95%置信区间[CI],0.86-1.06; p = .36)。敏感性分析在白人非西班牙裔和个人种族和种族之间没有发现显着差异,尽管观察了一些有意义的临床差异,但它们在分析骨科和泌尿外科患者时也没有发现显着差异。结论:在分析对单一学术儿童医院进行手术麻醉的患者的分析中,种族和种族与接受术中区域麻醉的调整或群体没有明显相关。这一发现与大部分现有的医疗保健差异文献形成鲜明对比,并认证进一步研究额外的数据集以了解所涉及的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号