...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
【24h】

Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

机译:静脉内患者控制镇痛的偶数级剂量的阿片类药物的副作用率:系统综述与网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Side effects of opioids used for the treatment of acute pain frequently limit their analgesic quality. Many studies have compared opioid side effects in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), but it remains unclear whether there are specific side effect profiles that can be exploited when choosing an opioid for a patient. In this review, we wanted to determine the risk ratios (RRs) for the most common side effects when using different opioids for intravenous PCA in equianalgesic doses and rank the substances accordingly. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science identified 63 randomized controlled trials comparing opioids under equianalgesic conditions. Inclusion criteria were comparable pain stimulus between groups, equal coanalgesic treatment, and comparable resulting pain scores. Quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool with 6 items. Frequentistic network meta-analysis was conducted with morphine as the comparator. This method not only summarizes all estimated effects from direct comparisons of different interventions but also allows for indirect comparisons between interventions that can be linked via the common comparator, in which case the indirect evidence can be used to enhance the precision of the direct comparisons. Primary end points of this study were RRs for nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and events of sedation, as well as mean differences for scores of sedation. Events of respiratory depression were counted. Secondary end point was patient satisfaction (mean difference). The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42017062355). RESULTS: Sixteen opioid interventions were compared in the largest network (nausea and vomiting outcome) and 7 opioid interventions in the smallest network (sedation events outcome). Most interventions did not differ from morphine on the primary outcomes (side effects), with some exceptions. Buprenorphine had a significantly higher RR of nausea and vomiting, whereas fentanyl had a lower RR of nausea and vomiting. Nalbuphine, butorphanol, methadone, and pethidine/meperidine had a lower risk of pruritus. Respiratory depression was rare (22 of 2452 patients). Pethidine/meperidine, fentanyl, and oxymorphone caused significantly lower sedation scores. Tramadol caused significantly lower satisfaction scores, whereas oxycodone, alfentanil, remifentanil, fentanyl, and pethidine/meperidine caused significantly higher satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: The opiate chosen for treatment most likely has little effect on the incidence of pruritus and nausea/vomiting, although considerable differences exist in terms of better and worse opioids in the presented rankings. Larger differences between drugs were observed with regard to sedation and patient satisfaction, and choosing the appropriate opioid may help to improve PCA in this regard.
机译:背景:用于治疗急性疼痛的阿片类药物的副作用经常限制其镇痛质量。许多研究已经在患者控制的镇痛(PCA)中比较了阿片样物质副作用,但是仍然尚不清楚是否存在在为患者选择阿片类药物时可以利用的特定副作用曲线。在本次综述中,我们希望在使用不同阿片类药物以偶数剂量的静脉内PCA使用不同阿片类药物时确定风险比(RRS),并相应地排列物质。方法:搜索Medline,Embase,Cochrane库(中央)和科学网鉴确定了63种随机对照试验,比较了等式条件下的阿片类药物。纳入标准是组之间的可比疼痛刺激,同等平节治疗和可比较的疼痛评分。使用6件物品的偏置工具的Cochrane风险评估研究质量。用吗啡作为比较器进行频繁的网络元分析。该方法不仅总结了来自不同干预的直接比较的所有估计效果,而且还允许间接比较可以通过公共比较器链接的干预措施,在这种情况下,间接证据可用于增强直接比较的精度。本研究的主要终点是恶心和呕吐,瘙痒和镇静事件的RRS,以及镇静分数的平均差异。计算呼吸抑郁症事件。次要终点是患者满意度(平均差异)。研究方案在Prospero注册(CRD42017062355)。结果:在最大的网络(恶心和呕吐结果)和最小网络中的7个阿片类药物干预措施中,将六个阿片类药物干预措施进行比较(镇静事件结果)。大多数干预措施与情况不同,对主要结果(副作用),有一些例外。 Buprenorphine具有显着高的恶心和呕吐的RR,而芬太尼有较低的恶心和呕吐。纳丙啡,丁啡,美沙酮和Pethidine / Meperidine的瘙痒风险较低。呼吸抑郁症是罕见的(22例2452名患者)。 Pethidine / Meperidine,芬太尼和氧解酮导致镇静分数明显降低。曲马多引起的满意度较低,而羟考酮,阿芬太尼,雷芬丹尼尔,芬太尼和哌啶/哌啶引起的满意度显着提高。结论:选择治疗的阿片类药物最有可能对瘙痒和恶心/呕吐的发病率几乎没有影响,尽管在所提出的排名中更好和更差的阿片类药物的差异存在相当大的差异。在镇静和患者满足方面观察到药物之间的较大差异,并选择合适的阿片类药物可能有助于改善这方面的PCA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号