首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Anesthesia Type Is Not Associated With Postoperative Complications in the Care of Patients With Lower Extremity Traumatic Fractures
【24h】

Anesthesia Type Is Not Associated With Postoperative Complications in the Care of Patients With Lower Extremity Traumatic Fractures

机译:麻醉类型与患有下肢创伤骨折的患者的术后并发症无关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity fracture fixation is commonplace and represents the majority of orthopedic trauma surgical volume. Despite this, few studies have examined the use of regional anesthesia or neuraxial anesthesia (RA/NA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in this surgical population. We aimed to determine the overall rates of RA/NA use and whether RA/NA was associated with lower mortality and morbidity versus GA for patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma. METHODS: We conducted a propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients. We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) dataset to identify patients undergoing surgical correction of low velocity orthopedic lower extremity traumas between 2011 and 2016. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on anesthesia type (RA/NA versus GA). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included return to the operating room, failure to wean from the ventilator, intubation, pneumonia, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, transfusion, venous thromboembolism (VTE), urinary tract infection, sepsis, length of stay, days from operation to discharge, number of complications, and unplanned readmission. RESULTS: We identified 18,467 patients undergoing surgical repair of lower extremity fractures. Approximately 9.58% had RA/NA and 89.9% had GA as their primary anesthetic. After 1:1 propensity matching, the final cohort had 3254 patients. Our analysis did not find a difference in 30-day mortality between the 2 groups. There were also no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential advantages of RA/NA, utilization for lower extremity trauma was low in our analysis; only 9.58% of patients were in the RA/NA group, with the majority receiving spinal anesthesia. This may be due to surgeon preference to allow for postoperative monitoring for neurologic injury and compartment syndrome or logistical factors given the urgent nature of these trauma cases. No significant differences in 30-day mortality and postoperative complications were found between RA/NA and GA for patients with lower extremity orthopedic fractures. The choice of anesthesia is multifactorial and may be driven by patient and provider preferences in these operations.
机译:背景:下肢断裂固定是常见的,代表大部分骨科外科手术量。尽管如此,少数研究已经研究了这种手术人群中的区域麻醉或神经麻醉(RA / NA)与全身麻醉(GA)的使用。我们的旨在确定RA / NA使用的总速率以及RA / NA是否与下肢整形外科创伤患者的死亡率和发病率降低。方法:对住院患者的竞争,回顾性群体进行了倾向匹配的。我们使用美国外科医生大学全国外科院校(ACS-NSQIP)数据集,以确定2011年和2016年间低速骨科下肢创伤的患者进行的患者。基于麻醉型分为2组(RA / Na与ga)。主要结果是30天死亡率。二次结果包括返回手术室,失败从呼吸机,插管,肺炎,急性肾损伤,心肌梗塞,输血,静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),尿路感染,败血症,寿命长度,从运作时的逗留时间,从运作到出处的日期,并发症次数,无计划的入院。结果:我们确定了18,467名接受下肢骨折手术修复的患者。大约9.58%的Ra / Na和89.9%的原发性麻醉剂具有89.9%。 1:1倾向匹配后,最终队列有3254名患者。我们的分析在2组之间的30天死亡率没有发现差异。二次结果也没有显着差异。结论:尽管RA / NA的潜在优势,但在我们的分析中,下肢创伤的利用率低;只有9.58%的患者在RA / Na组中,大多数接受脊髓麻醉。这可能是由于外科医生偏好,以允许术后监测神经系统损伤和隔室综合征或后勤因素给出了这些创伤病例的迫切性质。对于患有下肢整形前述骨折的患者,在RA / Na和Ga之间发现了30天死亡率和术后并发症的显着差异。麻醉的选择是多因素,并且可以在这些操作中由患者和提供者偏好驱动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号