首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Prophylactic Platelet Transfusions for Critically Ill Patients With Thrombocytopenia: A Single-Institution Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.
【24h】

Prophylactic Platelet Transfusions for Critically Ill Patients With Thrombocytopenia: A Single-Institution Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

机译:血小板减少症患者的预防血小板输血:单机制匹配队列队列队列队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thrombocytopenia is frequently encountered in critically ill patients, often resulting in prophylactic transfusion of platelets for the prevention of bleeding complications. However, the efficacy of this practice remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between prophylactic platelet transfusion and bleeding complications in critically ill patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to surgical, medical, or combined medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) at a single academic institution between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and a platelet count measured during ICU admission. Propensity-matched analyses were used to evaluate associations between prophylactic platelet transfusions and the outcomes of interest with a primary outcome of red blood cell transfusion in the ensuing 24 hours and secondary outcomes of ICU and hospital-free days and changes in sequential organ failure assessment scores. A total of 40,693 patients were included in the investigation with 3227 (7.9%) receiving a platelet transfusion and 1065 (33.0%) for which platelet transfusion was prophylactic in nature. In propensity-matched analyses, 994 patients with prophylactic platelet transfusion were matched to those without a transfusion. Patients receiving prophylactic platelets had significantly higher red blood cell transfusion rates (odds ratio 7.5 [5.9-9.5]; P < .001), fewer ICU-free days (mean [standard deviation] 20.8 [9.1] vs 22.7 [8.3] days; P = .004), fewer hospital-free days (13.0 [9.7] vs 15.8 [9.4] days; P < .001), and less improvement in sequential organ failure assessment scores (mean decrease of 0.2 [3.6] vs 1.8 [3.3]; P < .001) in the subsequent 24 hours. These findings appeared robust, persisting in multiple predefined sensitivity analyses. Prophylactic administration of platelets in the critically ill was not associated with improved clinical outcomes, though residual confounding may exist. Further investigation of platelet transfusion strategies in this population is warranted.
机译:血小板减少症经常在危重病患者中遇到,通常导致预防血小板的输血用于预防出血并发症。然而,这种做法的疗效仍然不清楚。本研究的目的是确定预防性血小板输血与批判性患者的出血并发症之间的关系。这是在2009年1月1日至2013年12月31日之间的单一学术机构入院的备注队列研究,该叙述群体入院的成人,涉及单一的学术机构,以及2013年12月31日。纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁在ICU入学期间测量的血小板计数。倾向匹配的分析用于评估预防性血小板输注与感兴趣结果与红细胞输血的主要结果之间的关联,并在随后的24小时和ICU和无医院的次要日期进行二次结果,以及顺序器官失效评估分数的变化。在调查中,共有40,693名患者纳入3227(7.9%),接受血小板输注和1065(33.0%),其中血小板输血是本质上的预防性。在倾向匹配的分析中,994例预防血小板输血患者与没有输血的人匹配。接受预防血小板的患者具有明显较高的红细胞输血率(数量比7.5 [5.9-9.5]; P <.001),更少的ICU的天(平均值[标准偏差] 20.8 [9.1] VS 22.7 [8.3]天; P = .004),无医院的天数(13.0 [9.7] Vs 15.8 [9.4天];顺序器官失效评估评分的较少改善(平均减少0.2 [3.6] [3.3] ]; p <.001)在随后的24小时内。这些发现出现了稳健的,持续存在于多种预定义的灵敏度分析。在批评性中,预防性血小板血小板与改善的临床结果无关,尽管可能存在残留的混杂性。有必要进一步调查该群体中血小板输血策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号