首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Fusiform aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar arterial trunk: choice of endovascular methods and therapeutic efficacy.
【24h】

Fusiform aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar arterial trunk: choice of endovascular methods and therapeutic efficacy.

机译:椎基底动脉干的梭状动脉瘤:血管内方法的选择和治疗效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Fusiform aneurysms (FUANs) of vertebrobasilar arterial (VBA) trunk are difficult to treat by using current surgical and endovascular techniques. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of FUANs of VBA trunk which was treated with various therapeutic modalities including unilateral or bilateral vertebral artery occlusion, trapping of the aneurysm with coils, stent-assistant coiling, or sole stenting. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, 17 patients with FUANs (ranged in size from 8 to 45 mm) of VBA trunk in our hospital underwent endovascular treatment in our hospital. Eleven patients were evaluated by test occlusion with nondetachable silicone balloon or hyperglide balloon, and seven patients in this series passed testing with temporary balloon occlusion, among which four patients showed positive result, and three patients were conducted bilateral VA test occlusion. Finally, nine patients underwent a trapping of the aneurysm by coils, four patients were treated with stent-supported coil embolization, and four patients with nonhemorrhagic FUAN of VBA were treated only by stenting. RESULTS: The average imaging follow-up was 28 months, with a range from 6 to 48 months. Fourteen (82%) had excellent or good outcome, three (17.6%) had a poor outcome, and one (5.8%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Management of FUANs of VBA trunk often poses difficult therapeutic problems. In some cases, multiple treatment sessions may be not only safe but also necessary for the effective treatment of these aneurysms to achieve a complete or an acceptable result.
机译:背景:椎基底动脉(VBA)躯干的梭状动脉瘤(FUAN)难以通过当前的外科和血管内技术进行治疗。这项研究的目的是比较经各种治疗方式治疗的VBA躯干的FUANs的功效,包括单侧或双侧椎动脉闭塞,线圈夹住动脉瘤,辅助支架盘绕或单独置入支架。方法:2000年至2008年间,我院17例VBA主干FUANs(大小在8mm至45mm之间)接受了血管内治疗。 11例患者行不可分离的硅胶球囊或超滑囊球囊测试,其中7例通过临时球囊闭塞测试,其中4例呈阳性,3例行双侧VA测试。最后,有9例患者被线圈困住了动脉瘤,四名患者接受了支架支撑的线圈栓塞治疗,四名VBA非出血性FUAN患者仅接受了支架治疗。结果:平均影像学随访时间为28个月,范围为6到48个月。十四名(82%)的结果好或好,三名(17.6%)的结果差,一名(5.8%)死亡。结论:VBA干线的FUAN的管理通常会带来棘手的治疗问题。在某些情况下,多次治疗不仅可能是安全的,而且对于有效治疗这些动脉瘤以达到完整或可接受的结果也是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号