...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of industrial medicine >Assessing the accuracy of the death certificate injury at work box for identifying fatal occupational injuries in Michigan
【24h】

Assessing the accuracy of the death certificate injury at work box for identifying fatal occupational injuries in Michigan

机译:评估工作箱中死亡证明损伤的准确性,以确定密歇根州的致命职业伤害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background Death certificates contain a box labeled “Injury at Work” which is to be marked “Yes” for all fatal occupational injuries. The accuracy of this box in Michigan is not fully characterized. Methods The accuracy of the Injury at Work box on the Michigan death certificate was compared to deaths identified from 2001 through 2016 by the Michigan Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation multi‐source surveillance system. The sensitivity was calculated across this time period, while specificity and positive and negative predictive values were derived for 2011‐2016. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to examine differences in the sensitivity over time and across demographic variables, industry, and the type of death. Results We found a sensitivity for the Injury at Work box of 73.1% among 2156 deaths. The sensitivity showed a significant declining trend over the 17 years, from 79.8% to 63.1%. Sensitivity varied significantly across incident type (aircraft, animal‐related, drug overdose, motor vehicle, and suicides having particularly lower sensitivities, and electrocutions, falls, and machine‐related incidents having higher sensitivities), and industry sector (construction, manufacturing, public safety, transportation, and trade sectors having higher sensitivities, and agriculture and services sectors showing lower sensitivities). Across nearly all categories the sensitivity was significantly below 1. Conclusions The Injury at Work box on the Michigan death certificate was often incorrectly completed and has become less accurate with time, though the degree of this inaccuracy varies by the industry of the victim and the type of incident.
机译:摘要背景死亡证明包含一个标记为“工作伤害”的盒子,这将为所有致命的职业伤害标记为“是”。密歇根州这个盒子的准确性没有完全表征。方法采用密歇根死亡率评估和控制评估多源监控系统2001年至2016年损害损伤的准确性。在该时间段计算的灵敏度,而来自2011-2016的特异性和正负预测值均可衍生出来。单变量和多变量回归用于检查随着时间的推移和人口变量,行业和死亡类型的敏感性的差异。结果我们在2156人死亡中找到了73.1%的工作舱伤害的敏感性。敏感性显示出17岁的显着下降趋势,从79.8%到63.1%。敏感性在入射型(飞机,动物相关,药物过量,机动车和具有较低敏感度的敏感性,触电和与机器相关的事件特别低的自由度方面有显着变化,以及具有更高敏感性的电闭)(建筑,制造,公共机构具有更高敏感性的安全,运输和贸易部门,以及显示较低的敏感性的农业和服务部门)。在几乎所有类别中,敏感性明显低于1.结论密歇根死亡证明的工作箱的伤害往往被错误地完成,并且随着时间的不准确度因受害者行业而变化而变得更加准确事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号