...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of industrial medicine >Types of ocular injury and their antecedent factors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Types of ocular injury and their antecedent factors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:眼部损伤的类型及其前一种因素:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Ocular injuries are an important workplace hazard that can lead to vision loss, decreased functioning, and socioeconomic costs. The aim of this systematic review is to identify types of occupational ocular injuries and examine factors associated with these injuries. Methods Four health sciences databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were reviewed to identify evidence pertaining to occupational ocular injuries. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018089876) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). The PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) tool was used to support, structure, and improve our search strategy. Results Overall, 12 studies with quantitative Critical Appraisal Skills Programme grading scores were assessed in a systematic review and meta‐analysis of ocular injuries in the workplace. The systematic review identified four main factors associated with occupational ocular injury: (a) use of eye protection at the time of the ocular injury, (b) being male, (c) exposure to biological or chemical occupational hazards, and (d) risk‐taking behavior. Conclusions Differences in risk between countries of origin, occupational sectors, and dates of publication, suggest likely differences or changes in safety procedures. We recommend that employers ensure that safety equipment is tailored to the protection of their specific occupational hazards, and that employees are adhering to safety protocols.
机译:摘要背景眼镜伤害是一个重要的工作场所危险,可以导致视力损失,下降的运作和社会经济成本。该系统审查的目的是鉴定职业眼损伤的类型,并检查与这些伤害相关的因素。方法审查了四种健康科学数据库(Ovid Medline,Embase,Psycinfo和Cinahl),以确定与职业眼损伤有关的证据。该系统审查是在Prospero注册的(注册号:CRD42018089876),并遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)。 PICO(人口/干预/比较/结果)工具用于支持,结构和改进我们的搜索策略。结果总体而言,12项具有定量关键评估技能计划分数的研究进行了评估,在工作场所的眼部损伤的系统审查和荟萃分析中评估了分数。系统审查确定了与职业眼损伤相关的四个主要因素:(a)在眼部损伤时使用眼睛保护,(b)是男性,(c)暴露于生物或化学职业危害,(d)风险 - 制作行为。结论原产地,职业部门和出版日期之间风险的差异,建议安全程序的差异或变化。我们建议雇主确保安全设备根据保护其特定的职业危害量身定制,员工遵守安全方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号