...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis
【24h】

The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis

机译:血糖和新生胺在成人逆转神经肌肉封锁中的比较疗效和安全性。 具有Meta分析和试验顺序分析的Cochrane系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary We compared the efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Our outcomes were: recovery time from second twitch to train‐of‐four ratio ?0.9; recovery time from post‐tetanic count 1–5 to train‐of‐four ratio ?0.9; and risk of composite adverse and serious adverse events. We searched for randomised clinical trials irrespective of publication status and date, blinding status, outcomes reported or language. We included 41 studies with 4206 participants. Time to reversal of neuromuscular blockade from second twitch to a train‐of‐four ratio ?0.9 was 2.0?min with sugammadex 2?mg.kg ?1 and 12.9?min with neostigmine 0.05?mg.kg ?1 , with a mean difference (MD) (95%CI)) of 10.2 (8.5–12.0) (I 2 ?=?84%, 10 studies, n?=?835, Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): moderate quality). Time to reversal of neuromuscular blockade from a post‐tetanic count of 1–5 to a train‐of‐four ratio ?0.9 was 2.9?min with sugammadex 4?mg.kg ?1 and 48.8?min with neostigmine 0.07?mg.kg ?1 , with a MD (95%CI) of 45.8 (39.4–52.2) (I 2 ?=?0%, 2 studies, n?=?114, GRADE : low quality). There were significantly fewer composite adverse events in the sugammadex group compared with neostigmine, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 0.60 (0.49–0.74) (I 2 ?=?40%, 28 studies, n?=?2298, number needed to treat (NNT): 8, GRADE : moderate quality). Specifically, the risk of bradycardia ( RR (95%CI) 0.16 (0.07–0.34), n?=?1218, NNT: 14, GRADE : moderate quality), postoperative nausea and vomiting ( RR (95%CI) 0.52 (0.28–0.97), n?=?389, NNT: 16, GRADE : low quality) and overall signs of postoperative residual paralysis ( RR (95%CI) 0.40 (0.28–0.57), n?=?1474, NNT: 13, GRADE : moderate quality) were all reduced. There was no significant difference regarding the risk of serious adverse events ( RR 0.54, 95%CI 0.13–2.25, I 2 ?=?0%, n?=?959, GRADE : low quality). Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular blockade more rapidly than neostigmine and is associated with fewer adverse events.
机译:发明内容我们比较了Sugammadex和Neostigmine在成人逆转神经肌肉封锁中的疗效和安全性。我们的结果是:从第二个抽搐到训练的培训时间为四个比例& 0.9;从滴答后的恢复时间为1-5到训练 - 四个比例&?0.9;以及复合不良和严重不良事件的风险。我们搜索了随机临床试验,无论出版状态和日期,致盲状态,报告还是语言的日期。我们包括41项研究,4206名参与者。从第二个抽搐到一个四个比赛的时间逆转神经肌肉封锁的时间和 ugammadex 2?mg.kg?1和12.9?min 0.05?mg.kg?1,带有一个10.2(8.5-12.0)(I 2?= 84%,10项研究,N?= 835,建议,评估,发展和评估等级(等级):中等质量)。从1-5的后塔卢克算法逆转神经肌肉封锁的时间,以四个比赛的比例& 0.9为2.9?min,sugammadex 4?mg.kg?1和48.8?min neostigmine 0.07?mg .kg?1,md(95%ci)为45.8(39.4-52.2)(I 2?= 0%,2研究,n?= 114,等级:低质量)。与新骨质碱相比,Sugammadex组的复合不良事件较少,风险比(95%CI)为0.60(0.49-0.74)(I 2?= 40%,28项研究,N?= 2298,数量需要治疗(NNT):8,等级:中等质量)。具体而言,心动过缓的风险(RR(95%CI)0.16(0.07-0.34),n?= 1218,NNT:14,级别:中等质量),术后恶心和呕吐(RR(95%CI)0.52(0.28 -0.97),n?=?389,NNT:16,等级:低质量)和术后残留瘫痪的总体迹象(RR(95%CI)0.40(0.28-0.57),n?= 1474,NNT:13,等级:中等质量)全部减少。关于严重不良事件的风险没有显着差异(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.13-2.25,I 2?= 0%,n?= 959,等级:低质量)。 Sugammadex比新骨质更快地逆转神经肌肉梗阻,并且与更少的不良事件相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号