首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Does a catheter over needle system reduce infusate leak in continuous peripheral nerve blockade: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Does a catheter over needle system reduce infusate leak in continuous peripheral nerve blockade: a randomised controlled trial

机译:针对针系统的导管是否会减少连续周围神经阻滞的输注泄漏:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Continuous peripheral nerve blockade is a common technique in the analgesic management for many procedures. Leakage of local anaesthetic from around the nerve catheter insertion site can increase the chance of catheter dislodgement, risks infective complications, and could divert anaesthetic away from the nerve causing the block to fail. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess whether the type of nerve catheter influenced local anaesthetic leak rate. One hundred and ten patients scheduled for elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomised to receive a perineural catheter with either a catheter over needle (CON) system (Pajunk (R) E-Cath) (Pajunk (R) GmbH, Medizintechnologie, Geisingen, Germany), or catheter through needle (CTN) system (Pajunk (R) SonoLong) (Pajunk (R) GmbH, Medizintechnologie, Geisingen, Germany). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of leaking catheters between groups (CON 1.8% versus CTN 3.7%; P=0.618), however, the overall leak rate was much lower than anticipated from pilot data. The CON system was on average faster to insert (CON 357 seconds versus CTN 482 seconds; P=0.004), but associated with poorer needle visibility under ultrasound (Likert scale 1-5, mean [SD], CON 3.31 [0.96] versus CTN 3.89 [0.84]; P=0.001). All seven instances of inadvertent catheter dislodgement occurred in the CTN group (P=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients who had adequate analgesia on day one (CON 80% versus CTN 86.5%; P=0.294) and day two postoperatively (CON 85.5% versus CTN 91.8%; P=0.369). Our findings show the overall leak rate to be very low with both catheter systems; however, the CON system may have advantages in terms of speed of use and rate of inadvertent catheter dislodgement.
机译:连续周围神经阻滞是许多程序中镇痛管理中的常用技术。从神经导管插入部位周围局部麻醉的泄漏可以增加导管脱臼的可能性,风险感染性并发症,并且可以将麻醉剂转移远离神经导致块失效。我们进行了随机对照试验,以评估神经导管的类型是否影响了局部麻醉泄漏率。一百十个患者安排出选修单侧总膝关节置换术的患者随机地接受带有导管(CON)系统的导管(PAJUNK(R)GmbH,Medizintechnologie,Geisionen,Geisingen,Geisingen,Geisingen,Geisingen,德国佩斯)或导管通过针头(CTN)系统(PAJunk(R)SonoLong)(Pajunk(R)GmbH,Medizintechnolyie,Geisionen,Germany)。然而,组之间的泄漏导管速率没有统计学上显着差异(相对于CTN 3.7%; P = 0.618),总泄漏率远低于导频数据的预期。插入平均值更快(CO 357秒与CTN 482秒; P = 0.004),但在超声波下的较差的针头可见性(李克特量表1-5,意味着[SD],Con 3.31 [0.96]与CTN相比3.89 [0.84]; p = 0.001)。 CTN组中发生了所有七种无意导管脱臼的情况(P = 0.006)。在第一天镇痛的患者的比例中没有统计学显着差异(CON 80%与CTN 86.5%; P = 0.294)和第二天(CON 85.5%与CTN 91.8%; P = 0.369) 。我们的研究结果表明,随着导管系统的整体泄漏率非常低;然而,CON系统可以在使用速度和无意导管脱臼速率方面具有优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号