首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Comparative study between different groups of esthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and eye tracking
【24h】

Comparative study between different groups of esthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and eye tracking

机译:不同群体畸形治疗指标的不同群体的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine how different people perceive distinct malocclusions with the use of eye tracking and to compare the results with scores from the subjective visual attractiveness scale (VAS) following 3 grades obtained from the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (AC-IOTN) scale. Methods: Ninety participants were equally distributed into 3 groups-dentists, orthodontists, and laypeople-and underwent 1 eye-tracking session. After being positioned and calibrated, they were shown 3 dental images. The images reflected the AC-IOTN grades of 1 (close to ideal), 5 (borderline need for treatment), and 8 (definite need for treatment). During the viewing, eye-tracker data were collected for fixation points, duration, and attractiveness (according to the VAS) for each image. The variables were statistically tested with the use of 2-way analysis of variance and complete factorial model (between groups, grades, and for the interactions between them). Results: Grade 1 received the highest subjective score independently from the participant group. This was in contrast to grades 5 and 8, which received similar scores, although the means of fixation points and duration were not significantly different among the grades (P > 0.05). The scores obtained from the dentist group were significantly higher than those from the other groups when the comparison was independent from the grade. In terms of fixation points, there were differences between dentists and orthodontists and between orthodontists and laypeople. The fixation point mean was higher for orthodontists than for dentists and was similar to that for laypeople. Conclusions: Orthodontists were able to closely analyze the occlusal problems presenting with more severe malocclusions, and the specialists noticed more fixation points. Duration times, however, were not significantly different, because the orthodontists had greater interest, even in situations of unfavorable esthetics.
机译:介绍:本研究的目的是确定不同人们如何在使用眼踪和从主观视觉吸引力范围(VAS)中获得从审美分量的审美部件的主观视觉吸引力量表(VAS)的分数来察觉不同的捕鼠器。正畸治疗需要(AC-IOTN)规模。方法:九十名参与者将其平均分为3组牙医,正畸医生和幼儿 - 并进行1个引人注目的会议。定位和校准后,它们显示出3个牙科图像。图像反映了1(接近理想)的AC-IOTN等级,5(边界需要治疗)和8(明确需要治疗)。在观看期间,收集眼睛跟踪器数据进行固定点,持续时间和吸引力(根据VAS)为每个图像。使用双向分析方差和完整阶乘模型(在组之间,等级和它们之间的相互作用之间使用双向分析,在统计上进行统计测试。结果:1年级从参与者组独立地获得了最高的主观评分。这与等级5和8相反,其获得相似的分数,尽管固定点和持续时间在等级中没有显着不同(P> 0.05)。当比较与等级无关时,从牙医组获得的分数明显高于其他组的分数。在固定点方面,牙医和矫正者之间存在差异,正畸症和外部人之间。定位点平均值对于牙齿的牙医比牙医更高,并且与胶质人相似。结论:正畸医生能够密切分析具有更严重的捕鼠器的咬合问题,专家注意到更多的固定点。然而,持续时间没有显着不同,因为即使在不利美学的情况下,矫正者也有更大的兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号