首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >The effects of fixed orthodontic retainers on periodontal health: A systematic review
【24h】

The effects of fixed orthodontic retainers on periodontal health: A systematic review

机译:固定正畸保留件对牙周健康的影响:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence in the literature for the effects of fixed orthodontic retainers on periodontal health. Methods: The following databases were searched up to August 31, 2019: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, the National Research Register, and Pro-Quest Dissertation Abstracts and Thesis database. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, cohort studies of prospective and retrospective design, and cross-sectional studies reporting on periodontal measurements of patients who received fixed retention after orthodontic treatment were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed per the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0), whereas the risk of bias of the included cohort studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for cross-sectional studies. Results: Eleven RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 13 cross-sectional studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was low for most of the included studies. In contrast to the general consensus, 2 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort study, and 2 cross-sectional studies reported poorer periodontal conditions in the presence of a fixed retainer. The results of the included studies comparing different types of fixed retainers were heterogeneous. Conclusions: According to the currently available literature, orthodontic fixed retainers seem to be a retention strategy rather compatible with periodontal health, or at least not related to severe detrimental effects on the periodontium.
机译:介绍:该系统审查的目的是评估文献中的可用证据,了解固定的正畸保留对牙周健康的影响。方法:以下数据库达到2019年8月31日:Medline,Embase,Cochrane口腔健康集团的试验登记册,中央,Clinicaltrial.gov,国家研究登记册和Pro-Quest论文摘要和论文数据库。随机对照试验(RCT),受控临床试验,前瞻性和回顾性设计的队列研究,以及报告在正畸治疗后接受固定保留的患者的牙周测量的横断面研究有资格纳入。根据对随机试验的偏置工具的修正Cochrane风险评估包含的RCT的质量,而使用干预工具的非扫描研究中的偏差风险评估包括的队列研究的偏差风险。纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模的修改版用于横断面研究。结果:11个RCT,4个潜在队列研究,1回顾性队列研究,13项横截面研究实现了纳入标准。对于大多数包括的研究,证据质量很低。与普遍共识,2个RCT,1个前瞻性队列研究和2项横截面研究报告了固定保持器存在下的较差的牙周病症。所附研究的结果比较不同类型的固定保持器是异质的。结论:根据目前可用的文献,正畸固定保留似乎是一种与牙周健康相似的保留策略,或者至少与对课程的严重不利影响无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号