首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Comparison of a collagen membrane versus a fibrin sealant after a peroneal nerve section and repair: A functional and histological study
【24h】

Comparison of a collagen membrane versus a fibrin sealant after a peroneal nerve section and repair: A functional and histological study

机译:腓总神经节和修复后胶原膜与纤维蛋白密封剂的比较:功能和组织学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: To date, fibrin sealant is considered to be one of the most effective substitutes to prevent post-operative fibrosis and to limit neuroma formation after nerve suture. Because fibrin sealant presents a number of drawbacks, more suitable techniques should be considered. The aim of this study was to functionally and histologically compare the efficiency of a fibrin sealant to a resorbable semi-permeable porcine type I collagen membrane after a peroneal nerve lesion and repair on rats. Methods: Rats were divided into four groups: (1) a SHAM group (n=10) in which surgery was performed without damaging the nerve, (2) a LESION group (n=15) in which the nerve was cut and immediately sutured without additional treatment, (3) a MEMBRANE group (n=30) in which a collagen membrane was wrapped around the lesion site, and (4) a GLUE group (n=30) in which the peroneal nerve was coated by fibrin sealant. Peroneal Functional Index (PFI), kinematic analysis of locomotion, muscular atrophy, axonal regrowth, and irritant ranking score (IRS) were performed during three months post-surgery. Results: Our results indicate that at the third month post-surgery, no difference in both the functional recovery and the histological measurement was observed between groups. However, no deleterious effect was observed following the use of the collagen membrane. Indeed, the porcine membrane was well-integrated into the host tissue, with no noticeable foreign body reaction at three months post-surgery. Conclusion: Our preliminary results highlight the fact that the collagen membrane could be used as an alternative to fibrin sealant in peripheral nerve repair surgery. Indeed, animals in which the collagen membrane was used to wrap the lesion site exhibited similar functional and histological results as animals in which a fibrin sealant was used to coat the lesion. The greatest advantage of this membrane is that it could be used as a drug delivery device, regulated by its degradation rate.
机译:背景:迄今为止,纤维蛋白封闭剂被认为是预防术后纤维化并限制神经缝合后神经瘤形成的最有效替代品之一。由于纤维蛋白封闭剂存在许多缺点,因此应考虑采用更合适的技术。这项研究的目的是在功能和组织学上比较腓肠神经损伤和修复后纤维蛋白封闭剂与可吸收的半透性猪I型胶原膜的功效。方法:将大鼠分为四组:(1)SHAM组(n = 10),在不损伤神经的情况下进行手术;(2)LESION组(n = 15),其中神经被切断并立即缝合无需进一步治疗,(3)病变部位周围包裹有胶原膜的MEMBRANE组(n = 30),以及(4)纤维蛋白封闭剂覆盖腓神经的GLUE组(n = 30)。术后三个月进行了腓骨功能指数(PFI),运动,肌肉萎缩,轴突再生和刺激性等级评分(IRS)的运动学分析。结果:我们的结果表明,在术后第三个月,两组之间的功能恢复和组织学测量均无差异。然而,在使用胶原膜后未观察到有害作用。实际上,猪膜已很好地整合到宿主组织中,在术后三个月没有明显的异物反应。结论:我们的初步结果突出了以下事实:胶原蛋白膜可替代纤维蛋白封闭剂用于周围神经修复手术。实际上,其中使用胶原蛋白膜包裹病变部位的动物表现出与其中使用纤维蛋白封闭剂包被病变的动物相似的功能和组织学结果。这种膜的最大优点是它可以用作药物输送装置,受其降解速率的调节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号