首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Correlation Between Neurologic Impairment Grade and Ambulation Status in the Adult Spina Bifida Population
【24h】

Correlation Between Neurologic Impairment Grade and Ambulation Status in the Adult Spina Bifida Population

机译:成人脊柱珠三草群中神经系统损伤等级与散动状态的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective The aim of the study was to identify which neurologic impairment scales correlate with ambulation status in adults with spina bifida. Design A retrospective chart review was performed on patients seen at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Adult Spina Bifida Clinic. Findings were graded using several neurologic impairment scales: two versions of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry classification, the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor level, and the Broughton Neurologic Impairment Scale. Ambulation ability was ranked using the Hoffer classification system. Results Data collected from 409 patient records showed significant correlations between Hoffer ambulation status and all neurologic impairment scales evaluated. The strongest correlation was noted with the Broughton classification (r(s) = -0.771, P < 0.001). High correlations were also noted with both versions of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: strength 3/5 or greater (r(s) = -0.763, P < 0.001), and strength 1/5 or greater (r(s) = -0.716, P < 0.001). For the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor level, only a moderate correlation was observed (r(s) = -0.565, P < 0.001). Conclusions Multiple grading scales can be used to measure motor function in adult spina bifida patients. Although the Broughton classification seems to be the most highly correlated with ambulation status, the less complex National Spina Bifida Patient Registry scale is also highly correlated and may be easier to administer in busy clinic settings. To Claim CME Credits Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at CME Objectives Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Explain the clinical significance of identifying ambulation status and maximizing ambulation potential in adults with spina bifida; (2) Describe each of the neurologic grading scales examined in this study, identifying potential shortcomings in applying them to the adult spina bifida population; and (3) Administer the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) impairment scale motor assessment in a standard adult spina bifida outpatient clinic visit. Level Advanced Accreditation The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)(TM). Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
机译:目的该研究的目的是确定哪种神经系统损伤鳞片与脊柱侧二离这里的成年人的动手状况相关。设计了回顾性图表审查,对匹兹堡医疗中心成人脊柱湖诊所的患者进行了对患者进行的。调查结果采用几种神经系统损伤量表进行了分级:两种版本的国家脊柱脉患者登记分类,脊髓损伤电机水平的国际神经分类标准,以及Broughton神经系统损伤量表。使用Hoffer分类系统排列的气管能力。结果从409名患者记录中收集的数据显示出Hoffer手提车辆状态与评估的所有神经系统损伤尺度之间的显着相关性。 Broughton分类(R(S)= -0.771,P <0.001)注意到最强的相关性。国家脊柱垫患者注册表的两个版本还注意到了高相关:强度3/5或更大(R(S)= -0.763,P <0.001)和强度1/5或更大(R(S)= - 0.716,p <0.001)。对于脊髓损伤电机水平的国际神经分类标准,观察到中等相关性(R(S)= -0.565,P <0.001)。结论可用于测量成人脊柱型患者的电机功能多重分级尺度。虽然Broughton分类似乎是最高度相关的气管状态,但较为复杂的国家脊柱峰患者登记处规模也具有高度相关性,并且在繁忙的诊所设置中可能更容易管理。为了索赔CME学分在完成本文后完成自我评估活动和在线上的评估,读者应能够:(1)解释鉴定肢体Bifida的成年人的临床意义和最大化的大使散发潜力; (2)描述本研究中检查的每种神经系统分级尺度,识别将它们施加到成人脊柱珠氏菌群中的潜在缺点; (3)在标准成人脊柱局Bifida门诊诊所访问中,管理国家脊柱峰二维达患者登记处(NSBPR)减值规模电机评估。级别高级认证学术物理学家协会是由认证理事会继续医学教育的认可,为医生提供持续的医学教育。学术物理学家的协会将该基于杂志的CME活动指定为最多1.0 AMA PRA类别1学分(TM)。医生应该只申请信贷与参与活动的程度相称。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号