...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >The Equity Impact of Proactive Outreach to Smokers: Analysis of a Randomized Trial
【24h】

The Equity Impact of Proactive Outreach to Smokers: Analysis of a Randomized Trial

机译:主动外展对吸烟者的股权影响:随机试验分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IntroductionPopulation-based smoking-cessation services tend to preferentially benefit high-SES smokers, potentially exacerbating disparities. Interventions that include proactive outreach, telephone counseling, and free or low-cost cessation medications may be more likely to help low-SES smokers quit. This analysis evaluated the role of SES in smokers’ response to a population-based proactive smoking-cessation intervention. MethodsThis study, conducted in 2016 and 2017, was a secondary analysis of the Veterans Victory Over Tobacco Study, a multicenter pragmatic RCT of a proactive smoking-cessation intervention conducted from 2009 to 2011. Logistic regression modeling was used to test the effect of income or education level on 6-month prolonged abstinence at 1-year follow-up. ResultsOf the 5,123 eligible, randomized participants, 2,565 (50%) reported their education level and 2,430 (47%) reported their income level. The interactions between education (p=0.07) or income (p=0.74) X treatment arm were not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The largest effect sizes for the intervention were found among smokers in the lowest education category (≤11th grade), with a quit rate of 17.3% as compared with 5.7% in usual care (OR=3.5, 95% CI=1.4, 8.6) and in the lowest income range (<$10,000), with a quit rate of 18.7% as compared with 9.4% in usual care (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.2, 4.0). ConclusionsIn a large, multicenter smoking-cessation trial, proactive outreach was associated with higher rates of prolonged abstinence among smokers at all SES levels. Proactive outreach interventions that integrate telephone-based care and facilitated cessation medication access have the potential to reduce socioeconomic disparities in quitting. Trial registrationThis study is registered atwww.clinicaltrials.govNCT00608426.
机译:基于出口的吸烟停止服务往往优先利用高海西吸烟者,可能会加剧差异。包括积极的外展,电话咨询和自由或低成本停止药物的干预措施可能更有可能帮助低SES吸烟者戒烟。这种分析评估了SE对吸烟者对基于人口的积极吸烟干预的作用的作用。 2016年和2017年进行的方法研究是对退伍军人胜利的二级分析,从烟草研究中,从2009年到2011年开始的主动吸烟停留干预的多中心务实RCT。用于测试收入的效果或教育水平在6个月的时间内延长了1年的随访时间。结果5,123符合条件的随机参与者,2,565名(50%)报告其教育水平,2,430(47%)报告其收入水平。教育(P = 0.07)或收入(P = 0.74)X治疗臂在0.05水平上没有统计学意义之间的相互作用。在最低教育类别(≤11年级)中的吸烟者中发现了最大的效果大小,戒烟率为17.3%,而通常护理(或= 3.5,95%CI = 1.4,8.6)在最低的收入范围(<10,000美元)中,退出率为18.7%,而通常护理(或= 2.2,95%CI = 1.2,4.0)。结论在所有SES水平的吸烟者之间的延长禁欲率较高的速度率相关。积极的外展干预措施,即整合基于电话的护理和促进的停止药物检查,有可能降低戒烟的社会经济差异。试验登记该研究是在atww.clinicaltrials.govnct00608426中注册的。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

    Division of Epidemiology University of Minnesota School of Public Health;

    Veterans Affairs Health Services Research &

    Development Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号