首页> 外文期刊>American journal of health promotion: AJHP >Cooperative Extension Gets Moving, but How? Exploration of Extension Health Educators' Sources and Channels for Information-Seeking Practices
【24h】

Cooperative Extension Gets Moving, but How? Exploration of Extension Health Educators' Sources and Channels for Information-Seeking Practices

机译:合作延期搬家,但怎么样? 拓展卫生教育者来源和渠道探索信息寻求行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The Cooperative Extension System (Extension) has implemented concerted efforts toward health promotion in communities across the nation by acting as an intermediary between communities and universities. Little is known about how these intermediaries communicate and learn about existing evidence-based programming. This study serves to explore this gap by learning about information sources and channels used within Extension. Design: Sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. Setting: National Cooperative Extension System. Participants: Extension community-based health educators. Methods: A nationally distributed survey with follow-up semistructured interviews. Survey results were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test paired with Bonferroni post hoc. Transcripts were analyzed by conventional content analysis. Results: One hundred twenty-one Extension educators from 33 states responded to the survey, and 18 of 20 invited participants completed the interviews. Educators' information seeking existed in 2 forms: (1) information sources for learning about programming and (2) channels by which this information is communicated. Extension educators reported contacting health specialists and other educators. Extension educators also reported using technological means of communication such as e-mail and Internet to reach information sources such as peers, specialists, academic journals, and so on. Conclusion: Extension state specialists were preferred as primary sources for intervention information, and technology was acknowledged as an easy contact channel. This study identifies county-based health educators' information structures and justifies the need for future research on the role of specialists in communication efforts for educators.
机译:目的:合作延长系统(延期)通过作为社区和大学之间的中介,实施了全国各地的社区健康促进的共同努力。众所周知,这些中介机构如何沟通和了解现有的基于证据的编程。本研究旨在通过了解扩展内使用的信息来源和渠道来探讨这种差距。设计:顺序解释性混合方法方法。环境:国家合作拓展系统。参与者:扩展社区的健康教育者。方法:具有随访的半系统访谈的全国分布式调查。使用kruskal-wallis双向分析与Bonferroni后HOC配对的kruskal-wallis 1-途分析进行了分析了调查结果。通过常规含量分析分析转录物。结果:来自33个州的一百二十一位延伸教育者回应了调查,20名邀请的参与者中有18个,完成了面试。教育者的信息寻求以2形式存在:(1)用于学习编程的信息来源和(2)通知该信息的渠道。推广教育者报告联系卫生专家和其他教育工作者。延长教育者还报告了使用电子邮件和互联网等技术手段,以达到同行,专家,学术期刊等信息来源。结论:延伸州专家优先作为干预信息的主要来源,技术被确认为简单的联系渠道。本研究识别县级的健康教育者的信息结构,并证明了未来研究专家在教育工作者沟通努力中的作用的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号