...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with Well-Managed Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding
【24h】

Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with Well-Managed Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding

机译:比较非维生素K拮抗剂口腔抗凝剂的成本效益,具有良好管理的华法林对心房颤动患者中风预防的高风险出血

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Several studies have compared the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin using results from clinical trials evaluating NOACs. However, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of warfarin groups ranged across clinical trials, and all were below the therapeutic goal of 70%. We compared the cost effectiveness of edoxaban 60 mg, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and well-managed warfarin with a TTR of 70% in preventing stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding.
机译:背景技术几项研究已经将非维生素K拮抗剂口腔抗凝血剂(NOACS)和华法林的成本效力与评估NOACS评估的临床试验结果进行了比较。 然而,Warfarin组的治疗范围(TTR)的时间在临床试验中,并且所有均低于治疗目标70%。 我们将Edoxaban 60mg的成本有效性与甲醛5mg,Dabigatran 150mg,Dabigatran 110mg,Rivaroxaban 20mg和良好管理的Warfarin的成本效果进行了70%,以预防心房颤动的患者在出血的高风险中预防卒中的70% 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号