首页> 外文期刊>Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica >Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment
【24h】

Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment

机译:关于麻醉学基于仿真培训技术程序的共识:基于Delphi的一般需求评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.
机译:背景技术麻醉学家预计将掌握越来越多的技术程序。基于模拟的程序培训可以补充,在某些领域,在患者护理时更换经典学徒方法。然而,基于仿真的培训非常资深密集,并且必须优先考虑并优化。开发基于模拟的程序培训的课程应遵循系统的方法,例如由KERN开发的六步方法。本研究的目的是开展国家一般需求评估,以确定和优先考虑麻醉学中基于模拟的培训技术程序。方法采用麻醉科关键意见领导人完成了三轮德尔福进程。在第一轮,参与者建议与基于模拟的培训相关的技术程序。在第二轮中,使用需求评估公式用于探索程序并产生初步优先列表。在第三轮中,参与者通过消除和重新确定程序来评估初步清单。结果丹麦的所有教学部门都以全部三轮的高响应率代表:79%,77%和75%。 Delphi进程制作了适用于初始138个建议的基于模拟的培训的30个程序组的优先级列表。最终列表中的前5名是心肺复苏,直接和视频喉镜,除颤,急诊瘤术和纤维电解质插管。需求评估公式在很大程度上预测了最终的优先级。结论Delphi进程制作了一个优先的30个程序组列表,可作为未来课程开发的指导,以便基于麻醉学的技术程序的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号