首页> 外文期刊>AJOB empirical bioethics. >Exploring Institutional Research Ethics Systems: A Case Study From Uganda
【24h】

Exploring Institutional Research Ethics Systems: A Case Study From Uganda

机译:探索机构研究伦理系统:乌干达的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The increasing globalization of research drives a need for greater research ethics capacity in low resource countries. Several programs have attempted to expand research ethics capacity by training individuals, but few have focused on broader research ethics systems and institutions. This study describes and applies an institutional research ethics model to assess the institutional research ethics capacity of Makerere University College of Heath Sciences (MakCHS) in 2011. Methods: Internal and external stakeholders conducted the assessment of MakCHS using the multidimensional Octagon framework. Five methods were used to collect data on current ethical processes and institutional relationships. Results: MakCHS scored in the mid range on all Octagon domains, with some variation between external and internal assessments. The external Octagon scores suggest that MakCHS's areas of strengths are in identity, structure, relevance, target groups, and working environment; needs are greater in the areas of production, competence, and systems of finance and administration. Discrepancies in external and internal assessment can serve as a useful platform to shape ongoing discussions and strategic efforts. Conclusions: The assessment identified strengths, opportunities, and challenges for institutional research ethics capacity at MakCHS. We believe this systematic approach was helpful in evaluating research ethics needs and provides a benchmark for institutions to measure progress over time.
机译:背景:研究的全球化越来越多的全球化推动了低资源国家的提高研究伦理能力。若干方案试图通过培训个人扩大研究伦理能力,但很少有人侧重于更广泛的研究伦理系统和机构。本研究介绍并采用了一个制度研究伦理模型,从2011年评估了Makerere大学(MAKCHS)的制度研究伦理能力使用五种方法来收集关于当前伦理过程和制度关系的数据。结果:MAKCHS在所有八角体域的中档中得分,外部和内部评估之间的某些变化。外部八边形分数表明Makchs的优势领域处于身份,结构,相关性,目标群体和工作环境;在金融和管理系统的生产,能力和系统系统领域需求更大。外部和内部评估的差异可以作为一种有用的平台来塑造持续的讨论和战略努力。结论:评估确定了MAKCHS的制度研究伦理能力的优势,机会和挑战。我们认为,这种系统的方法有助于评估研究道德需求,并为机构提供基准,以便随着时间的推移衡量进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号