首页> 外文期刊>AJOB empirical bioethics. >Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries
【24h】

Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries

机译:儿科肿瘤的决策:两个欧洲国家的父母和医生的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Decision making is a highly complex task when providing care for seriously ill children. Physicians, parents, and children face many challenges when identifying and selecting from available treatment options. Methods: This qualitative interview study explored decision-making processes for children with cancer at different stages in their treatment in Switzerland and Romania. Results: Thematic analysis of interviews conducted with parents and oncologists identified decision making as a heterogeneous process in both countries. Various decisions were made based on availability and reasonableness of care options. In most cases, at the time of diagnosis, parents were confronted with a "choiceless choice"—that is, there was only one viable option (a standard protocol), and physicians took the lead in making decisions significant for health outcomes. Parents' and sometimes children's role increased during treatment when they had to make decisions regarding research participation and aggressive therapy or palliative care. Framing these results within the previously described Decisional Priority in Pediatric Oncology Model (DPM) highlights family's more prominent position when making elective decisions regarding quality-of-life or medical procedures, which had little effect on health outcomes. The interdependency between oncologists, parents, and children is always present. Communication, sharing of information, and engaging in discussions about preferences, values, and ultimately care goals should be decision making's foundation. Conclusions: Patient participation in these processes was reported as sometimes limited, but parents and oncologists should continue to probe patients' abilities and desire to be involved in decision making. Future research should expand the DPM and explore how decisional priority and authority can be shared by oncologists with parents and even patients.
机译:背景:在为严重生病儿童提供护理时,决策是一个非常复杂的任务。在识别和选择可用的治疗方案时,医生,父母和儿童面临着许多挑战。方法:这种定性访谈研究在瑞士和罗马尼亚治疗不同阶段的癌症探讨了癌症的决策过程。结果:与父母和肿瘤科学专家进行专题分析,并确定了两国内异质过程的决策。根据护理选择的可用性和合理性制定了各种决定。在大多数情况下,在诊断时,父母面临着“可选择的选择” - 这是,只有一个可行的选择(标准议定书),医生率先对卫生结果做出重大做出决定。父母的父母,有时儿童的角色在治疗过程中不得不做出关于研究参与和侵略性治疗或姑息治疗的决定。这些结果在前面描述的儿科肿瘤学模型(DPM)中突出的果断优先率突出了在制定关于生活质量或医疗程序的选修决策时更加突出的位置,这对健康结果没有影响。肿瘤学家,父母和儿童之间的相互依赖程度总是存在。通信,分享信息,并参与偏好,价值观,最终关怀目标的讨论应该是决策的基础。结论:患者参与这些过程被报告为有时有限,但父母和肿瘤科医生应该继续探讨患者的能力和愿望参与决策。未来的研究应扩大DPM,并探讨肿瘤学家与父母甚至患者的肿瘤诊断和权威如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号