...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Finance Review >Factors affecting the use of forage index insuranceEmpirical evidence from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada
【24h】

Factors affecting the use of forage index insuranceEmpirical evidence from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada

机译:影响来自阿尔伯塔和萨斯喀彻温省的牧草指数的使用的因素来自加拿大的萨斯塔瓦和萨斯喀彻温

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine factors affecting the use of forage index insurance. Forage is a difficult crop to insure, and index insurance may be well suited for forage insurance and has been implemented in several countries, including Canada, the USA and France. Despite being a promising risk management tool, forage index insurance participation rates in Canada, and other countries are low relative to crop insurance participation rates for grain and oilseed producers.Design/methodology/approach - A survey was conducted with 87 beef and cattle producers from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. A probit regression model was used, and a number of variables were included to examine the use of forage index insurance.Findings - In total, 6 of 11 variables in the model are found to be statistically significant in explaining forage producers' use of forage index insurance. Results suggest that producers who maintain lower feed reserves are more likely to purchase forage index insurance. Also, producers with higher levels of knowledge of crop insurance and a more positive attitude toward forage insurance are more likely to use forage index insurance. Furthermore, producers are more likely to use forage index insuranceif they perceive drought and weather risk as being of greater importance, and if they are younger. The importance of the variable forage index insurance premium price was statistically insignificant. This could be due to the effect of subsidization, reducing the importance of price for the decision to purchase. Similarly, the use of other subsidized risk management policies, including a whole-farm margin policy (e.g. the government program and AgriStability), did not reduce forage index insurance use. Apossible explanation for this is that the subsidization of the policies may make it profitable to purchase both, despite the overlapping coverage. Practical implications - These results may be useful for policy makers interested in increasing forage index insurance participation rates, as forage index insurance participation rates have historically been low relative to grain and oilseed producers.Originality/value - This study is believed to be one of the first studies regarding the use of forage index insurance by forage producers. Producers can be exposed to catastrophic risks such as drought or other extreme weather events, and forage index insurance may be an effective means to manage these risks. Index insurance determines payments using an index that is correlated to producers' actual yields. A downside of this method is basis risk, which is the mismatch between the insured index and the producer's actual yield. Research has focused on basis risk and developing improved methods to reduce basis risk. However, less research has investigated the other important factors that may contribute to forage index insurance use. Producers may have a different risk management environment regarding forage production compared toother farm activities, and these differences have largely not been examined.
机译:目的 - 本文的目的是检查影响牧草指数保险使用的因素。饲料是保险的难度作物,指数保险可能非常适合牧草保险,并在包括加拿大,美国和法国在内的几个国家实施。尽管是一个有前途的风险管理工具,但加拿大的牧草指数保险参与率,而其他国家相对于作物保险参与率低,粮食和油籽生产商的作物保险率.Design/Methodology/Approach - 一项调查是用87个牛肉和牛生产商进行的调查。阿尔伯塔和萨斯喀彻温省,加拿大。使用探测回归模型,包括一些变量来检查饲料指数保险的使用。挑战 - 在模型中的11个变量中的6个中,在解释牧草生产商使用牧草指数时,在统计上存在统计学意义保险。结果表明,维持较低饲料储备的生产商更有可能购买牧草指数保险。此外,具有较高级别的作物保险和对牧草保险态度更高的生产者更有可能使用牧草指数保险。此外,生产者更有可能使用牧草指数保险,因为他们认为干旱和天气风险是更重要的,如果他们更年轻。可变牧草指标保险费价格的重要性统计上微不足道。这可能是由于补贴的影响,降低了价格决定的价格的重要性。同样,使用其他补贴风险管理政策,包括整个农场保证金政策(例如政府方案和农具),并没有减少饲料指数保险使用。尽管如此,但是,尽管覆盖范围重叠,但策略的补贴可能使两者的补贴可以使其盈利。实际意义 - 这些结果对于有兴趣增加散文指数保险参与率的政策制定者可能有用,因为饲料指数保险参与率相对于粮食和油籽生产者历史上较低。更多的/价值 - 这项研究被认为是其中之一第一次饲养生产者使用牧草指数保险的研究。生产者可以暴露于灾难性的风险,如干旱或其他极端天气事件,牧草指数保险可能是管理这些风险的有效手段。指数保险使用与生产者实际产量相关的指数来确定付款。这种方法的缺点是基础风险,这是保险指数与生产者的实际产量之间的不匹配。研究以基础风险为重点,并开发改进的方法,以降低基础风险。然而,较少的研究已经调查了可能有助于饲养指数保险的其他重要因素。制片人可能对饲料生产有不同的风险管理环境,与其他农场活动相比,这些差异在很大程度上没有被检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号