...
首页> 外文期刊>AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses >Prevalence and virologic consequences of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in Uganda
【24h】

Prevalence and virologic consequences of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in Uganda

机译:乌干达传播HIV-1耐药性的患病率和病毒学后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Few reports have examined the impact of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in resource-limited settings where there are fewer regimen choices and limited pretherapy/posttherapy resistance testing. In this study, we examined TDR prevalence in Kampala and Mbarara, Uganda and assessed its virologic consequences after antiretroviral therapy initiation. We sequenced the HIV-1 protease/reverse transcriptase from n=81 and n=491 treatment-naive participants of the Uganda AIDS Rural Treatment Outcomes (UARTO) pilot study in Kampala (AMU 2002-2004) and main cohort in Mbarara (MBA 2005-2010). TDR-associated mutations were defined by the WHO 2009 surveillance mutation list. Posttreatment viral load data were available for both populations. Overall TDR prevalence was 7% (Kampala) and 3% (Mbarara) with no significant time trend. There was a slight but statistically nonsignificant trend indicating that the presence of TDR was associated with a worse treatment outcome. Virologic suppression (≤400 copies/ml within 6 months posttherapy initiation) was achieved in 87% and 96% of participants with wildtype viruses versus 67% and 83% of participants with TDR (AMU, MBA p=0.2 and 0.1); time to suppression (log-rank p=0.3 and p=0.05). Overall, 85% and 96% of study participants achieved suppression regardless of TDR status. Surprisingly, among the TDR cases, approximately half still achieved suppression; the presence of pretherapy K103N while on nevirapine and fewer active drugs in the first regimen were most often observed with failures. The majority of patients benefited from the local HIV care system even without resistance monitoring. Overall, TDR prevalence was relatively low and its presence did not always imply treatment failure.
机译:少数报告已经检查了HIV-1传输的耐药性(TDR)的影响,在资源限制的环境中,在较少的方案选择和有限的前疗法/晚期抗性测试中。在这项研究中,我们在武士南巴,乌干达检测了TDR患病率,并在抗逆转录病毒治疗开始后评估其病毒后果。我们用n = 81和n = 491个治疗 - 朴素的乌干达农村治疗结果(UARTO)试验研究(乌塔图)试验研究的HIV-1蛋白酶/逆转录酶测序,在坎帕拉(AMU 2002-2004)和MBARARA的主要队列(MBA 2005 -2010)。 TDR相关的突变由WHO 2009监测突变名单定义。适用于两种人口的后病毒负荷数据。总体TDR患病率为7%(KAMPALA)和3%(Mbarara),没有显着的时间趋势。有一种轻微但统计学上的趋势趋势,表明TDR的存在与较差的治疗结果有关。病毒学抑制(6个月内6个月内的拷贝/ ml)在87%和96%的野生型病毒的87%和96%的参与者中实现,与TDR(AMU,MBA P = 0.2和0.1)的67%和83%的参与者;抑制时间(日志排名p = 0.3和p = 0.05)。总体而言,85%和96%的学习参与者取得了抑制,无论TDR状态如何。令人惊讶的是,在TDR病例中,大约一半仍然取得了抑制;在Nevirapine上的乳房K103n的存在,并且在第一方案中的较少的活性药物中最常被失败观察到。大多数患者即使没有阻力监测,也受益于局部艾滋病毒护理系统。总体而言,TDR流行率相对较低,其存在并不总是意味着治疗失败。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    B.C. Centre for Excellence HIV/AIDS 603-1081 Burrard Street Vancouver BC V6Z1Y6 Canada;

    Mbarara University of Science of Technology Mbarara Uganda Harvard Medical School Boston MA;

    Mbarara University of Science of Technology Mbarara Uganda;

    Mbarara University of Science of Technology Mbarara Uganda;

    University of California San Francisco CA United States;

    Mbarara University of Science of Technology Mbarara Uganda;

    University of California San Francisco CA United States;

    University of California San Francisco CA United States;

    B.C. Centre for Excellence HIV/AIDS 603-1081 Burrard Street Vancouver BC V6Z1Y6 Canada;

    B.C. Centre for Excellence HIV/AIDS 603-1081 Burrard Street Vancouver BC V6Z1Y6 Canada;

    B.C. Centre for Excellence HIV/AIDS 603-1081 Burrard Street Vancouver BC V6Z1Y6 Canada;

    University of California San Francisco CA United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传染病 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号